Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of Ingenol-B on the suppressive capacity of elite suppressor HIV-specific CD8+ T cells.
Kwaa, Abena K; Goldsborough, Kennedy; Walker-Sperling, Victoria E; Pianowski, Luiz F; Gama, Lucio; Blankson, Joel N.
Affiliation
  • Kwaa AK; Center for AIDS Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Goldsborough K; Center for AIDS Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Walker-Sperling VE; Center for AIDS Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Pianowski LF; Kyolab, Campinas, Brazil.
  • Gama L; Department of Molecular and Comparative Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Blankson JN; Center for AIDS Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 12(5): e0174516, 2017.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28467486
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Some latency-reversing agents (LRAs) inhibit HIV-specific CD8+ T cell responses. In a prior study of protein kinase C (PKC) agonists, we found that bryostatin-1 inhibited elite controller/suppressor (ES) CD8+ T cell suppressive activity whereas prostratin had no effect. Ingenol-B is another PKC agonist with potent LRA activity both by itself and in combination with the bromodomain inhibitor JQ1; however its effect on CD8+ T cell mediated control of HIV-1 replication is unknown.

METHODS:

CD8+ T cells were isolated from ES and treated with bryostatin-1, prostratin, ingenol-B, and JQ1 as well as a combination of each PKC-agonist with JQ1. The cells were then tested in the viral suppression assay. To assess possible mechanisms of inhibition, CD8+ T cells were treated with the LRAs and analyzed for the expression of various immune cell markers.

RESULTS:

Ingenol-B had no effect on the ability of ES CD8+ T cells to suppress viral replication, however, the combination of ingenol-B and JQ1 caused a modest, but significant decrease in this suppressive capacity. The mechanism of the inhibitory effect of the JQ1 and ingenol-B combination relative to ingenol-B alone was unclear but the effect appeared to be dose dependent.

CONCLUSIONS:

Ingenol-B does not inhibit HIV-specific CD8+ T cell responses in vitro. These responses are however modestly inhibited when 100 nMingenol-B is combined with JQ1. Since HIV-specific CD8+ T cell activity may be essential for the eradication of reactivated latently infected cells, the potency of latency-reversal activity of drug combinations must be balanced against the effects of the combinations on HIV-specific CD8+ T cell responses.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: HIV-1 / CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes / Diterpenes Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2017 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: HIV-1 / CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes / Diterpenes Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2017 Type: Article