Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PRECEPT: an evidence assessment framework for infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control.
Harder, Thomas; Takla, Anja; Eckmanns, Tim; Ellis, Simon; Forland, Frode; James, Roberta; Meerpohl, Joerg J; Morgan, Antony; Rehfuess, Eva; Schünemann, Holger; Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun; de Carvalho Gomes, Helena; Wichmann, Ole.
Affiliation
  • Harder T; Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany.
  • Takla A; Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany.
  • Eckmanns T; Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany.
  • Ellis S; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, United Kingdom.
  • Forland F; Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • James R; Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Meerpohl JJ; Cochrane Germany, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Morgan A; Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Rehfuess E; Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Schünemann H; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Zuiderent-Jerak T; Department of Thematic Studies -Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • de Carvalho Gomes H; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Wichmann O; Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany.
Euro Surveill ; 22(40)2017 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29019317
ABSTRACT
Decisions in public health should be based on the best available evidence, reviewed and appraised using a rigorous and transparent methodology. The Project on a Framework for Rating Evidence in Public Health (PRECEPT) defined a methodology for evaluating and grading evidence in infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control that takes different domains and question types into consideration. The methodology rates evidence in four domains disease burden, risk factors, diagnostics and intervention. The framework guiding it has four steps going from overarching questions to an evidence statement. In step 1, approaches for identifying relevant key areas and developing specific questions to guide systematic evidence searches are described. In step 2, methodological guidance for conducting systematic reviews is provided; 15 study quality appraisal tools are proposed and an algorithm is given for matching a given study design with a tool. In step 3, a standardised evidence-grading scheme using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE) methodology is provided, whereby findings are documented in evidence profiles. Step 4 consists of preparing a narrative evidence summary. Users of this framework should be able to evaluate and grade scientific evidence from the four domains in a transparent and reproducible way.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Communicable Disease Control / Communicable Diseases / Evidence-Based Medicine Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2017 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Communicable Disease Control / Communicable Diseases / Evidence-Based Medicine Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2017 Type: Article