Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term changes in oral health-related quality of life of standard, cleft, and surgery patients after orthodontic treatment: A longitudinal study.
Nichols, Grace A L; Antoun, Joseph S; Fowler, Peter V; Al-Ani, Azza H; Farella, Mauro.
Affiliation
  • Nichols GAL; Hospital Dental Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Antoun JS; Discipline of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Electronic address: joseph.antoun@otago.ac.nz.
  • Fowler PV; Hospital Dental Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Al-Ani AH; Discipline of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Farella M; Discipline of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 153(2): 224-231, 2018 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29407499
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The aim of this study was to assess long-term changes and describe the trajectories of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in a cohort of cleft, surgery, and standard patients who received orthodontic treatment.

METHODS:

Standard (n = 16), cleft (n = 19), and orthognathic surgery (n = 22) patients completed the short-form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) before treatment, immediately posttreatment, and approximately 5 years posttreatment.

RESULTS:

An overall reduction in OHIP-14 scores (improvement in OHRQoL) occurred after orthodontic treatment; however, this was only significant for the surgery and standard groups (P <0.05). The total OHIP-14 score increased significantly from posttreatment to 5 years follow-up for all 3 study groups (P <0.05). Relative to pretreatment, however, there were significant reductions in total OHIP-14 scores at 5 years posttreatment in the surgery group (-57.4%; P <0.05), but not in the standard sample (-24.2%; P >0.05). By contrast, the OHIP-14 score in the cleft group increased but not significantly (40.2%; P >0.05). Using a mixed model analysis, a significant interaction was detected between patient group and time (ie, study time point) (F = 6.0; P <0.0001), after adjusting for age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS:

Distinct patient groups showed different OHRQoL trajectories after orthodontic treatment. Treatment-related improvements in OHRQoL are maintained over time for surgery patients, but not for those with standard malocclusions and orofacial clefts.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Oral Health / Cleft Lip / Cleft Palate / Orthognathic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Year: 2018 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Oral Health / Cleft Lip / Cleft Palate / Orthognathic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Year: 2018 Type: Article