Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52).
Hendriks, Steven H; Blanker, Marco H; Roelofsen, Yvonne; van Hateren, Kornelis J J; Groenier, Klaas H; Bilo, Henk J G; Kleefstra, Nanne.
Affiliation
  • Hendriks SH; Diabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands. shhendriks@outlook.com.
  • Blanker MH; Department of General Practice, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Roelofsen Y; Diabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
  • van Hateren KJJ; Medical Research Group, Langerhans, Ommen, the Netherlands.
  • Groenier KH; Department of General Practice, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Bilo HJG; Diabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
  • Kleefstra N; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 266, 2018 04 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29636042
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about the association between patient-related factors and patients' evaluation of care. Aim was to investigate which patient-related factors are associated with patients' evaluation of care in men and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional study included 1102 patients with T2D from 52 general practices. We measured patients' evaluation with the EUROPEP questionnaire and collected demographic, clinical and psychological data from questionnaires and health records. Stepwise linear regression analyses were used.

RESULTS:

The location where the questionnaire was completed (at home or at the general practice) was associated with all outcomes in men and women. Next to this, in men, explanatory factors for the care provider EUROPEP subscale were use of insulin, having some problems with T2D self-care and coffee consumption (R2 8.4%); coffee consumption was associated with the general practice subscale (R2 4.0%). In women, well-being, quality of life, following a general diet, and use of oral glucose-lowering drugs were associated with the care provider subscale (R2 16.8%). For the general practice subscale, well-being and age were explanatory factors (R2 9.4%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Only a few factors were found to be associated with patients' evaluation of care for men and women with T2D. Taken together, these factors explained only a small part of the variance of the EUROPEP scores. This explained variance was largely attributable to the location where the questionnaire was completed. We therefore advise to be aware of the possible consequences of filing-out questionnaires about patients' evaluation of care at the general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01570140 (Clinicaltrials.gov). Registered 29 March 2012.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / General Practice Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2018 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / General Practice Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2018 Type: Article