Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoping review of reporting 'Ethical Research Practices' in research conducted among refugees and war-affected populations in the Arab world.
Makhoul, Jihad; Chehab, Rana F; Shaito, Zahraa; Sibai, Abla M.
Affiliation
  • Makhoul J; Department of Health Promotions and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Chehab RF; Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
  • Shaito Z; Regional External Programs, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Sibai AM; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. am00@aub.edu.lb.
BMC Med Ethics ; 19(1): 36, 2018 05 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29764456
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ethical research conduct is a cornerstone of research practice particularly when research participants include vulnerable populations. This study mapped the extent of reporting ethical research practices in studies conducted among refugees and war-affected populations in the Arab World, and assessed variations by time, country of study, and study characteristics.

METHODS:

An electronic search of eight databases resulted in 5668 unique records published between 2000 and 2013. Scoping review yielded 164 eligible articles for analyses.

RESULTS:

Ethical research practices, including obtaining institutional approval, access to the community/research site, and informed consent/assent from the research participants, were reported in 48.2, 54.9, and 53.7% of the publications, respectively. Institutional approval was significantly more likely to be reported when the research was biomedical in nature compared to public health and social (91.7% vs. 54.4 and 32.4%), when the study employed quantitative compared to qualitative or mixed methodologies (61.7% vs. 26.8 and 42.9%), and when the journal required a statement on ethical declarations (57.4% vs. 27.1%). Institutional approval was least likely to be reported in papers that were sole-authored (9.5%), when these did not mention a funding source (29.6%), or when published in national journals (0%). Similar results were obtained for access to the community site and for seeking informed consent/assent from study participants.

CONCLUSIONS:

The responsibility of inadequacies in adherence to ethical research conduct in crisis settings is born by a multitude of stakeholders including funding agencies, institutional research boards, researchers and international relief organizations involved in research, as well as journal editors, all of whom need to play a more proactive role for enhancing the practice of ethical research conduct in conflict settings.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Refugees / Research Design / Social Sciences / Public Health / Armed Conflicts / Biomedical Research Type of study: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2018 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Refugees / Research Design / Social Sciences / Public Health / Armed Conflicts / Biomedical Research Type of study: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2018 Type: Article