Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is self-sampling to test for high-risk papillomavirus an acceptable option among women who have been treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Andersson, Sonia; Belkic, Karen; Mints, Miriam; Östensson, Ellinor.
Affiliation
  • Andersson S; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Belkic K; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mints M; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Östensson E; School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 13(6): e0199038, 2018.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29912903
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Self-sampling to test for high risk human papilloma virus (HPV) is becoming an increasingly important component of cervical cancer screening. The aim of this observational study is to examine how women treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) view HPV self-sampling.

METHODS:

Invited to participate in the present study were patients who had undergone treatment of high-grade CIN (grade 2 or higher) and were followed-up at 6-months at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm. The participants were instructed as to how to perform HPV self-sampling. Thereafter, the participants completed a questionnaire about HPV self-sampling and other cervical cancer screening methods, as well as about self-perceived risk of cervical cancer without regular gynecologic follow-up and about specific knowledge regarding HPV, CIN and cervical cancer.

RESULTS:

Altogether 479 women enrolled in this study. The participation rate was 96.6%. Nearly 75% of the participants stated they would consider performing the HPV self-sampling prior to their next gynecologic follow-up. Confidence in HPV self-sampling was a significant independent predictor of willingness to perform HPV self-sampling. However, confidence in HPV self-sampling was significantly lower than confidence in Papanicolaou smears and in HPV testing with samples collected by health professionals. Higher specific knowledge about HPV, CIN and cervical cancer was also a significant independent predictor of willingness to perform HPV self-sampling, as was having travelled longer distance to attend gynecologic follow-up. Participants with lower income and without completed university education expressed significantly higher confidence in HPV self-sampling and lower confidence in Papanicolaou smears than the other women.

CONCLUSIONS:

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the views of women treated for high-grade CIN vis-à-vis HPV self-sampling. The latter is an acceptable option for the vast majority of this cohort of women.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Self Care / Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / Papillomavirus Infections Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Year: 2018 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Self Care / Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / Papillomavirus Infections Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Year: 2018 Type: Article