Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Discordance of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation between primary lung tumor and paired distant metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee, Chia Ching; Soon, Yu Yang; Tan, Char Loo; Koh, Wee Yao; Leong, Cheng Nang; Tey, Jeremy Chee Seong; Tham, Ivan Weng Keong.
Affiliation
  • Lee CC; Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Soon YY; Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tan CL; Department of Pathology, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Koh WY; Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Leong CN; Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tey JCS; Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tham IWK; Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
PLoS One ; 14(6): e0218414, 2019.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216329
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the rate of discordance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation between primary lung tumor and paired distant metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS:

We performed a meta-analysis of 17 studies (518 cases) assessing discordance rates of EGFR mutation in primary tumors and paired distant metastases. We performed subgroup analyses based on EGFR mutation status in primary tumor (mutant or wildtype), site of distant metastasis (bone, central nervous system (CNS) or lung/ pleural), methods of testing (direct sequencing or allele-specific testing) and timing of metastasis (synchronous or metachronous).

RESULTS:

The overall discordance rate in EGFR mutation was low at 10.36% (95% CI = 4.23% to 18.79%) and varied widely between studies (I2 = 83.18%). The EGFR discordance rate was statistically significantly higher in bone metastases (45.49%, 95% CI = 14.13 to 79.02) than CNS (17.26%, 95% CI = 7.64 to 29.74; P = 0.002) and lung/ pleural metastases (8.17%, 95% CI = 3.35 to 14.85; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate any significant effect modification on the discordance rates by the EGFR mutation status in primary lung tumor, methods of testing and timing of metastasis.

CONCLUSION:

The overall discordance rate in EGFR mutation between primary lung tumor and paired distant metastases in NSCLC is low, although higher discordance rates were observed in bone metastases compared with CNS and lung/pleural metastases. Future studies assessing the impact of EGFR mutation discordance on treatment outcomes are required.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Neoplasms / Central Nervous System Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2019 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Neoplasms / Central Nervous System Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2019 Type: Article