Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and organizational management of cardiac implantable electronic device replacements: an Italian Survey promoted by AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing).
Palmisano, Pietro; Ziacchi, Matteo; Belotti, Giuseppina; Rapacciuolo, Antonio; Santini, Luca; Stabile, Giuseppe; Zoni Berisso, Massimo; De Ponti, Roberto; Landolina, Maurizio; Ricci, Renato Pietro; Boriani, Giuseppe.
Affiliation
  • Palmisano P; Cardiology Unit, 'Card. G. Panico' Hospital, Tricase.
  • Ziacchi M; Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna.
  • Belotti G; Cardiology Division, Ospedale di Treviglio, ASST Bergamo Ovest.
  • Rapacciuolo A; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples.
  • Santini L; Cardiology Division, 'Giovan Battista Grassi' Hospital, Ostia Lido, Rome.
  • Stabile G; Clinica Mediterranea, Napoli.
  • Zoni Berisso M; Department of Cardiology, ASL 3, Padre A Micone Hospital, Genoa.
  • De Ponti R; Department of Heart and Vessels, Ospedale di Circolo & Macchi Foundation, University of Insubria, Varese.
  • Landolina M; Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Maggiore, Crema.
  • Ricci RP; Department of Cardiology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome.
  • Boriani G; Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 20(8): 531-541, 2019 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259858
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The aim of this survey was to assess the management and organization of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) replacement in Italy.

METHODS:

A questionnaire consisting of 24 questions on organizational aspects and on the peri-procedural management of anticoagulant therapies and antibiotic prophylaxis was sent via the Internet to 154 Italian arrhythmia centers.

RESULTS:

A total of 103 out of 154 centers completed the questionnaire (67% response rate). In 43% of the centers, the procedures were performed under day-case admission, in 40% under ordinary admission, and in 17% under either day-case or ordinary admission. The most frequent reason (66%) for choosing ordinary admission rather than day-case admission was to obtain full reimbursement. Although warfarin therapy was continued in 73% of the centers, nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants were discontinued, without bridging, 24 h or less prior to replacement procedures in 88%. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy was systematically administered in all centers; in 97%, the first antibiotic dose was administered 1-2 h prior to procedures. Local antibacterial envelopes were also used in 43% of the centers in patients with a higher risk of device infection.

CONCLUSION:

This survey provides a representative picture of how CIED replacements are organized and managed in current Italian clinical practice. The choice of the type of hospitalization (short versus ordinary) was more often motivated by economic reasons (reimbursement of the procedure) than by clinical and organizational factors. Peri-procedural management of anticoagulation and prophylactic antibiotic therapy was consistent with current scientific evidence.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Electric Countershock / Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / Defibrillators, Implantable / Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Device Removal / Anticoagulants Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Year: 2019 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Electric Countershock / Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / Defibrillators, Implantable / Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Device Removal / Anticoagulants Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Year: 2019 Type: Article