Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Tolerance and Complication Rates Between Early and Delayed Feeding After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Children.
Peck, Jacquelin; Mills, Katie; Dey, Aditi; Nguyen, Anh Thy H; Amankwah, Ernest K; Wilsey, Alexander; Swan, Emily; Son, Sorany; Karjoo, Sara; McClenathan, Daniel; Wilsey, Michael.
Affiliation
  • Peck J; Division of Anesthesia.
  • Mills K; Division of Hematology.
  • Dey A; Division of Pediatrics.
  • Nguyen ATH; Health Informatics, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg.
  • Amankwah EK; Health Informatics, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg.
  • Wilsey A; Florida State University, Tallahassee.
  • Swan E; Division of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Tampa.
  • Son S; Office of Graduate Medical Education.
  • Karjoo S; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL.
  • McClenathan D; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL.
  • Wilsey M; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 70(1): 55-58, 2020 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567888
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Enteral nutrition is commonly initiated 24 hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children. Adult studies report safe refeeding within 1 to 6 hours of PEG, and these findings have been cautiously applied to children. Comparative studies assessing early versus next-day refeeding in children are currently lacking. This study evaluates feeding tolerance and complications following early versus next-day refeeding in children.

METHODS:

This is a single-center, pre-post study. In June 2015 our clinical practice changed to begin refeeding within 6 hours of PEG. Children receiving early refeeding from December 2015 to August 2017 were included. A retrospective cohort from February 2013 to April 2015 was used for comparison.

RESULTS:

Forty-six children received early refeeding after PEG and 37 received next-day refeeding. Gender distribution was similar in the 2 groups. Early refeeding patients were slightly older (3.5 vs 2.2 years) and heavier (15.5 vs 11.5 kg) at PEG placement compared to next-day refeeding patients. Early refeeding patients experienced greater postprocedural nausea and/or vomiting (19% vs 8%, P < 0.001) and leakage, irritation, and infection around the stoma (19% vs 0.0%, P < 0.001). Compared to early refeeders, next-day refeeding patients experienced higher occurrence of fever (35% vs 13%, P = 0.021), longer nutritional disruption (24.6 vs 3.7 hours, P < 0.001), and longer length of stay (51 vs 27 hours; P < 0.001). One next-day refeeding patient experienced peritonitis. One early refeeding patient experienced cellulitis requiring hospitalization and a second experienced gastrostomy tube migration into the peritoneal cavity requiring removal.

CONCLUSION:

Early refeeders experienced higher rates of postprocedural nausea or vomiting and irritation, leakage, or infection around the stoma; but experienced lower rates of postoperative fever. Early refeeding resulted in reduced nutritional interruption and hospital length of stay.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Time Factors / Gastrostomy / Enteral Nutrition / Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Time Factors / Gastrostomy / Enteral Nutrition / Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article