Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of duloxetine response in patients with neuropathic cancer pain: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial-JORTC-PAL08 (DIRECT) study.
Matsuoka, Hiromichi; Iwase, Satoru; Miyaji, Tempei; Kawaguchi, Takashi; Ariyoshi, Keisuke; Oyamada, Shunsuke; Satomi, Eriko; Ishiki, Hiroto; Hasuo, Hideaki; Sakuma, Hiroko; Tokoro, Akihiro; Matsuda, Yoshinobu; Tahara, Kazuki; Otani, Hiroyuki; Ohtake, Yoichi; Tsukuura, Hiroaki; Matsumoto, Yoshihisa; Hasegawa, Yoshikazu; Kataoka, Yuki; Otsuka, Masatomo; Sakai, Kiyohiro; Nakura, Miki; Morita, Tatsuya; Yamaguchi, Takuhiro; Koyama, Atsuko.
Affiliation
  • Matsuoka H; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. matsuoka_h@med.kindai.ac.jp.
  • Iwase S; Palliative Care Center, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. matsuoka_h@med.kindai.ac.jp.
  • Miyaji T; Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia. matsuoka_h@med.kindai.ac.jp.
  • Kawaguchi T; Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Ariyoshi K; Department of Clinical Trial Data Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Oyamada S; Department of Practical Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Satomi E; Japanese Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (JORTC), JORTC Data Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ishiki H; Japanese Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (JORTC), JORTC Data Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hasuo H; Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sakuma H; Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Tokoro A; Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Matsuda Y; Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Tahara K; Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan.
  • Otani H; Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan.
  • Ohtake Y; Yamanobe General Hospital Internal medicine, Nara, Japan.
  • Tsukuura H; Department of Palliative Medicine, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Matsumoto Y; Itami Seifu Hospital Internal medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Hasegawa Y; Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
  • Kataoka Y; Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Otsuka M; Department of Medical Oncology, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan.
  • Sakai K; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Nakura M; Department of Palliative Medicine, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan.
  • Morita T; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Yamaguchi T; Palliative Care Center, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Koyama A; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(6): 2931-2939, 2020 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31761974
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Duloxetine has some effect against cancer neuropathic pain (CNP); however, predictors of duloxetine response are unclear. This study sought to identify predictors of duloxetine response in patients with CNP.

METHODS:

Patients (N = 70) with CNP unresponsive to or intolerant of opioid-pregabalin combination therapy, with a brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) Item 5 score (average pain) ≥ 4, and with a total hospital anxiety and depression scale score < 20, were randomized to a duloxetine or a placebo group. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of duloxetine response as a secondary analysis with the change in the average pain score on day 10 from day 0 as the dependent variable, and the following five covariates; baseline (day 0) average pain score, baseline opioid dose, continuation/discontinuation of pregabalin, and items 20 and 21 score of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2) as independent variables.

RESULTS:

Of the four domains (continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain, and affective descriptors) score of SF-MPQ-2 on day 0, significant differences were observed in the neuropathic pain domain (p = 0.040) in change on the average pain between day 10 and day 0 in the duloxetine group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that patients with a high score for SF-MPQ-2 Item 21 (tingling pain) on day 0 had a significantly greater change in average pain between day 10 and day 0 (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION:

Patients with a high score for SF-MPQ-2 Item 21 might benefit more from duloxetine.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain Measurement / Duloxetine Hydrochloride / Cancer Pain / Neuralgia Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain Measurement / Duloxetine Hydrochloride / Cancer Pain / Neuralgia Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article