Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CMR DENSE and the Seattle Heart Failure Model Inform Survival and Arrhythmia Risk After CRT.
Bilchick, Kenneth C; Auger, Daniel A; Abdishektaei, Mohammad; Mathew, Roshin; Sohn, Min-Woong; Cai, Xiaoying; Sun, Changyu; Narayan, Aditya; Malhotra, Rohit; Darby, Andrew; Mangrum, J Michael; Mehta, Nishaki; Ferguson, John; Mazimba, Sula; Mason, Pamela K; Kramer, Christopher M; Levy, Wayne C; Epstein, Frederick H.
Affiliation
  • Bilchick KC; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: bilchick@virginia.edu.
  • Auger DA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Abdishektaei M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Mathew R; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Sohn MW; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Cai X; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Sun C; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Narayan A; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Malhotra R; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Darby A; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Mangrum JM; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Mehta N; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Ferguson J; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Mazimba S; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Mason PK; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Kramer CM; Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Levy WC; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Epstein FH; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 13(4): 924-936, 2020 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31864974
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to determine if combining the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM-D) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides complementary prognostic data for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillators.

BACKGROUND:

The SHFM-D is among the most widely used risk stratification models for overall survival in patients with heart failure and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and CMR provides highly detailed information regarding cardiac structure and function.

METHODS:

CMR Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) strain imaging was used to generate the circumferential uniformity ratio estimate with singular value decomposition (CURE-SVD) circumferential strain dyssynchrony parameter, and the SHFM-D was determined from clinical parameters. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine adjusted hazard ratios and time-dependent areas under the curve for the primary endpoint of death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device, or appropriate ICD therapies.

RESULTS:

The cohort consisted of 100 patients (65.5 [interquartile range 57.7 to 72.7] years; 29% female), of whom 47% had the primary clinical endpoint and 18% had appropriate ICD therapies during a median follow-up of 5.3 years. CURE-SVD and the SHFM-D were independently associated with the primary endpoint (SHFM-D hazard ratio 1.47/SD; 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.03; p = 0.02) (CURE-SVD hazard ratio 1.54/SD; 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.11; p = 0.009). Furthermore, a favorable prognostic group (Group A, with CURE-SVD <0.60 and SHFM-D <0.70) comprising approximately one-third of the patients had a very low rate of appropriate ICD therapies (1.5% per year) and a greater (90%) 4-year survival compared with Group B (CURE-SVD ≥0.60 or SHFM-D ≥0.70) patients (p = 0.02). CURE-SVD with DENSE had a stronger correlation with CRT response (r = -0.57; p < 0.0001) than CURE-SVD with feature tracking (r = -0.28; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS:

A combined approach to risk stratification using CMR DENSE strain imaging and a widely used clinical risk model, the SHFM-D, proved to be effective in this cohort of patients referred for CRT defibrillators. The combined use of CMR and clinical risk models represents a promising and novel paradigm to inform prognosis and device selection in the future.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Electric Countershock / Decision Support Techniques / Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine / Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy / Heart Failure Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Electric Countershock / Decision Support Techniques / Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine / Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy / Heart Failure Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article