Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of neuromuscular blocking agent use in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Chang, Wei; Sun, Qin; Peng, Fei; Xie, Jianfeng; Qiu, Haibo; Yang, Yi.
Affiliation
  • Chang W; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
  • Sun Q; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
  • Peng F; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
  • Xie J; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
  • Qiu H; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
  • Yang Y; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China. yiyiyang2004@163.com.
Crit Care ; 24(1): 54, 2020 02 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32066488
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We aimed to synthesize up-to-date trials to validate the effects of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) use in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS:

Several databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register were searched up to November 14, 2019. All randomized trials investigating the use of NMBAs in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS and reporting mortality data were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were clinical outcomes, including respiratory physiological parameters, incidence of barotrauma, ICU-free days, and ventilation-free days.

RESULTS:

A total of 7 trials enrolling 1598 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that the use of NMBAs in moderate-to-severe ARDS could significantly decrease the mortality truncated to day 28 (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.98, P = 0.03) and day 90 (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99, P = 0.04). NMBA use could significantly decrease the incidence of barotrauma (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.87, P = 0.009). No significant difference was observed in ICU-free days or ventilation-free days between the NMBA and control groups.

CONCLUSION:

The use of NMBAs could significantly decrease mortality in moderate-to-severe ARDS patients and decrease the incidence of barotrauma during mechanical ventilation. However, more large-scale randomized trials are needed to further validate the effect of NMBA use in ARDS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Neuromuscular Blocking Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Neuromuscular Blocking Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article