Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Availability of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-authorised retailers' voluntary commitments to encourage healthy dietary purchases using marketing-mix and choice-architecture strategies.
Houghtaling, Bailey; Serrano, Elena; Kraak, Vivica I; Harden, Samantha M; Davis, George C; Misyak, Sarah.
Affiliation
  • Houghtaling B; School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University AgCenter, 271 Knapp Hall, Baton Rouge, LA70803, USA.
  • Serrano E; Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA24061, USA.
  • Kraak VI; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA24061, USA.
  • Harden SM; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA24061, USA.
  • Davis GC; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA24061, USA.
  • Misyak S; Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA24061, USA.
Public Health Nutr ; 23(10): 1745-1753, 2020 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32178757
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine public commitments for encouraging United States consumers to make healthy dietary purchases with their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits among of prevalent SNAP-authorised retailers.

SETTING:

National SNAP-authorised retail landscape in addition to stores located in California and Virginia, two states targetted for a Partnership for a Healthier America pilot social marketing campaign.

PARTICIPANTS:

SNAP-authorised retailers with the most store locations in selected settings.

DESIGN:

A review of retailers' publicly available business information was conducted (November 2016-February 2017). Webpages and grey literature sources were accessed to identify corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports and commitments describing strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases aligned with the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Evidence was organised using a marketing-mix and choice-architecture (MMCA) framework to characterise strategies used among eight possible types (i.e. place, profile, portion, pricing, promotion, priming, prompting and proximity).

RESULTS:

Of the SNAP-authorised retailers (n 38) reviewed, more than half (n 20; 52·6 %) provided no information in the public domain relevant to the research objective. Few retailers (n 8; 21·1 %) had relevant CSR information; grey literature sources (n 52 articles across seventeen retailers) were more commonly identified. SNAP-authorised retailers in majority committed to increasing the number of healthy products available for purchase (profile).

CONCLUSIONS:

Substantial improvements are needed to enhance the capacity and commitments of SNAP-authorised retailers to use diverse strategies to promote healthy purchases among SNAP recipients. Future research could explore feasible approaches to improve dietary behaviours through sector changes via public-private partnerships, policy changes, or a combination of government regulatory and voluntary business actions.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Commerce / Marketing / Food Assistance / Food Supply / Diet, Healthy Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Commerce / Marketing / Food Assistance / Food Supply / Diet, Healthy Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article