Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The roles of study setting, response bias, and personality in subjective memory complaints of cognitively normal older adults.
Goldberg, Sarah M; Lopez, Oscar L; Cohen, Ann D; Klunk, William E; Aizenstein, Howard A; Mizuno, Akiko; Snitz, Beth E.
Affiliation
  • Goldberg SM; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Lopez OL; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Cohen AD; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Klunk WE; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Aizenstein HA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Mizuno A; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Snitz BE; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 33(7): 665-676, 2021 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32188533
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated subjective memory complaints in older adults and the roles of setting, response bias, and personality. DESIGN: Cognitively normal older adults from two settings completed questionnaires measuring memory complaints, response bias, and personality. SETTINGS: (A) Neuroimaging study with community-based recruitment and (B) academic memory clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Cognitively normal older adults who (A) volunteer for research (N = 92) or (B) self-referred to a memory clinic (N = 20). MEASUREMENTS: Neuropsychological evaluation and adjudication of normal cognitive status were done by the neuroimaging study or memory clinic. This study administered self-reports of subjective memory complaints, response bias, five-factor personality, and depressive symptoms. Primary group differences were examined with secondary sensitivity analyses to control for sex, age, and education differences. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in over-reporting response bias between study settings. Under-reporting response bias was higher in volunteers. Cognitive complaints were associated with response bias for two cognitive complaint measures. Neuroticism was positively associated with over-reporting in evaluation-seekers and negatively associated with under-reporting in volunteers. The relationship was reversed for Extraversion. Under-reporting bias was positively correlated with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness in volunteers. CONCLUSION: Evaluation-seekers do not show bias toward over-reporting symptoms compared to volunteers. Under-reporting response bias may be important to consider when screening for memory impairment in non-help-seeking settings. The Memory Functioning Questionnaire was less sensitive to reporting biases. Over-reporting may be a facet of higher Neuroticism. Findings help elucidate psychological influences on self-perceived cognitive decline and help seeking in aging and may inform different strategies for assessment by setting.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Personality / Aging / Health Surveys / Cognition / Diagnostic Self Evaluation / Self Report / Memory Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Personality / Aging / Health Surveys / Cognition / Diagnostic Self Evaluation / Self Report / Memory Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Year: 2021 Type: Article