Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient and tumour characteristics associated with inclusion in Cancer patient pathways in Norway in 2015-2016.
Nilssen, Yngvar; Brustugun, Odd Terje; Eriksen, Morten Tandberg; Haug, Erik Skaaheim; Naume, Bjørn; Møller, Bjørn.
Affiliation
  • Nilssen Y; Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway. yngvar.nilssen@kreftregisteret.no.
  • Brustugun OT; Section of Oncology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
  • Eriksen MT; Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Haug ES; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Naume B; Section of Urology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
  • Møller B; Institute of Cancer Genomics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 488, 2020 May 30.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32473650
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cancer patient pathways (CPPs) were implemented in 2015 to reduce waiting time, regional variation in waiting time, and to increase the predictability of cancer care for the patients. The aims of this study were to see if the national target of 70% of all cancer patients being included in a CPP was met, and to identify factors associated with CPP inclusion.

METHODS:

All patients registered with a colorectal, lung, breast or prostate cancer diagnosis at the Cancer Registry of Norway in the period 2015-2016 were linked with the Norwegian Patient Registry for CPP information and with Statistics Norway for sociodemographic variables. Multivariable logistic regression examined if the odds of not being included in a CPP were associated with year of diagnosis, age, sex, tumour stage, marital status, education, income, region of residence and comorbidity.

RESULTS:

From 2015 to 2016, 30,747 patients were diagnosed with colorectal, lung, breast or prostate cancer, of whom 24,429 (79.5%) were included in a CPP. Significant increases in the probability of being included in a CPP were observed for colorectal (79.1 to 86.2%), lung (79.0 to 87.3%), breast (91.5 to 97.2%) and prostate cancer (62.2 to 76.2%) patients (p < 0.001). Increasing age was associated with an increased odds of not being included in a CPP for lung (p < 0.001) and prostate cancer (p < 0.001) patients. Colorectal cancer patients < 50 years of age had a two-fold increase (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.70-2.91) in the odds of not being included in a CPP. The odds of no CPP inclusion were significantly increased for low income colorectal (OR = 1.24, 95%CI 1.00-1.54) and lung (OR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.16-1.99) cancer patients. Region of residence was significantly associated with CPP inclusion (p < 0.001) and the probability, adjusted for case-mix ranged from 62.4% in region West among prostate cancer patients to 97.6% in region North among breast cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

The national target of 70% was met within 1 year of CPP implementation in Norway. Although all patients should have equal access to CPPs, a prostate cancer diagnosis, older age, high level of comorbidity or low income were significantly associated with an increased odds of not being included in a CPP.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Breast Neoplasms / Colorectal Neoplasms / Critical Pathways / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Limits: Aged80 Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Breast Neoplasms / Colorectal Neoplasms / Critical Pathways / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Limits: Aged80 Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article