Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in the periodontal microbiome of successfully treated and persistent aggressive periodontitis.
Nibali, Luigi; Sousa, Vanessa; Davrandi, Mehmet; Spratt, David; Alyahya, Qumasha; Dopico, Jose; Donos, Nikos.
Affiliation
  • Nibali L; Periodontology Unit, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Sousa V; Centre for Oral Immunobiology & Regenerative Medicine & Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
  • Davrandi M; Centre for Oral Immunobiology & Regenerative Medicine & Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
  • Spratt D; Microbial Diseases Department, University College London Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
  • Alyahya Q; Microbial Diseases Department, University College London Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
  • Dopico J; Periodontology Unit, University College London Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
  • Donos N; Periodontics Department, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
J Clin Periodontol ; 47(8): 980-990, 2020 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32557763
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The primary aim of this investigation was to analyse the periodontal microbiome in patients with aggressive periodontitis (AgP) following treatment.

METHODS:

Sixty-six AgP patients were recalled on average 7 years after completion of active periodontal treatment and had subgingival plaque samples collected and processed for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analyses.

RESULTS:

Of 66 participants, 52 showed persistent periodontal disease, while 13 participants were considered as "successfully treated AgP" (no probing pocket depths >4 mm) and 1 was fully edentulous. Genera associated with persistent generalized disease included Actinomyces, Alloprevotella, Capnocytophaga, Filifactor, Fretibacterium, Fusobacterium, Leptotrichia, Mogibacterium, Saccharibacteria [G-1], Selenomonas and Treponema. "Successfully treated" patients harboured higher proportions of Haemophilus, Rothia, and Lautropia and of Corynebacterium, Streptococcus and Peptidiphaga genera. Overall, patients with persistent generalized AgP (GAgP) revealed higher alpha diversity compared to persistent localized AgP (LAgP) and stable patients (p < .001). Beta diversity analyses revealed significant differences only between stable and persistent GAgP groups (p = .004).

CONCLUSION:

Patients with persistent AgP showed a more dysbiotic subgingival biofilm than those who have been successfully treated. It remains to be established whether such differences were predisposing to disease activity or were a result of a dysbiotic change associated with disease recurrence in the presence of sub-standard supportive periodontal therapy or other patient-related factors.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aggressive Periodontitis / Dental Plaque / Microbiota Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aggressive Periodontitis / Dental Plaque / Microbiota Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article