Preliminary Findings After Nonoperative Management of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury on a Background of Degenerative Disc Disease: Providing Optimum Patient Care and Costs Saving in a Nigerian Setting.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the hypothesis that nonoperative management would be a viable treatment option for patients with underlying degenerative disease who have traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSI) without neurological deterioration and/or spinal instability during hospitalization. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 2011 to 2016. All the patients had been treated nonoperatively with hard cervical collar immobilization. The clinical parameters assessed included the Frankel grade at presentation and discharge, the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infection, sphincter dysfunction, and pressure sores. The radiographic data collected included magnetic resonance imaging signal cord changes. P ≤ 0.05 represented a significant association between the Frankel grade at presentation and the outcome parameters. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included in the present study. Of the patients who had presented with Frankel grade B, 85.71% had improved to a higher grade, 90.91% of the patients with Frankel grade C had improved to a higher grade, and 14.29% of the patients with Frankel grade D had improved to Frankel grade E. All the patients had satisfactory spinal stability, as evidenced by dynamic radiographs, after treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present study have shown that nonoperative management can result in improved neurological outcomes for patients with underlying degenerative disease who have experienced TCSI without evidence of neurological deterioration and spinal instability. The Frankel grade at presentation was significantly associated with outcome parameters such as the neurological outcome on discharge and the occurrence of urinary tract infection. The results from the present study could be helpful to neurological surgeons in rural and other low-resource settings because the cost savings realized by nonoperative treatment will not sacrifice the provision of adequate care to their patients.