Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in cancer prevalence among CHEK2 carriers identified via multi-gene panel testing.
Sutcliffe, Erin G; Stettner, Amy R; Miller, Stacey A; Solomon, Sheila R; Marshall, Megan L; Roberts, Maegan E; Susswein, Lisa R; Arvai, Kevin J; Klein, Rachel T; Murphy, Patricia D; Hruska, Kathleen S.
Affiliation
  • Sutcliffe EG; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA. Electronic address: esutcliffe@genedx.com.
  • Stettner AR; MyGeneTeam, 4400 Biscayne Blvd, Miami, FL 33137, USA.
  • Miller SA; MyGeneTeam, 4400 Biscayne Blvd, Miami, FL 33137, USA.
  • Solomon SR; MyGeneTeam, 4400 Biscayne Blvd, Miami, FL 33137, USA.
  • Marshall ML; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
  • Roberts ME; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
  • Susswein LR; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
  • Arvai KJ; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
  • Klein RT; MyGeneTeam, 4400 Biscayne Blvd, Miami, FL 33137, USA.
  • Murphy PD; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
  • Hruska KS; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
Cancer Genet ; 246-247: 12-17, 2020 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805687
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Although CHEK2 is a well-established cancer gene, questions remain including whether risks vary substantially between different variants and whether biallelic carriers have higher risks than heterozygotes. We report on a cohort of individuals with CHEK2 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (collectively, PV) in order to better characterize this gene.

METHODS:

We retrospectively queried samples submitted for multi-gene hereditary cancer testing to identify individuals with CHEK2 PVs and assessed differences in phenotypes among various genotypes.

RESULTS:

CHEK2 PVs were identified in 2508 individuals, including 32 individuals with biallelic CHEK2 PVs. Breast (female, 59.9% and male, 11.8%), prostate (20.1%), and colorectal (3.5%), were among the most frequently reported cancers. Select missense PVs showed similar cancer prevalence to truncating PVs while some others showed lower prevalence. No significant differences were observed between biallelic carriers and heterozygotes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our data support that some, but not all, CHEK2 missense PVs demonstrate lower cancer prevalence; further studies are needed to continue characterizing possible variant specific risks. In addition, biallelic CHEK2 PVs do not appear to be associated with a more severe phenotype than single CHEK2 PVs. Furthermore, co-occurrences with PVs in other cancer risk genes are common among CHEK2 heterozygotes and often warrant additional management.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genetic Variation / Biomarkers, Tumor / Genetic Testing / Checkpoint Kinase 2 / Heterozygote / Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genetic Variation / Biomarkers, Tumor / Genetic Testing / Checkpoint Kinase 2 / Heterozygote / Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article