Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study).
Booth, Thomas C; Luis, Aysha; Brazil, Lucy; Thompson, Gerry; Daniel, Rachel A; Shuaib, Haris; Ashkan, Keyoumars; Pandey, Anmol.
Affiliation
  • Booth TC; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK. tombooth@doctors.org.uk.
  • Luis A; Department of Neuroradiology Ruskin Wing, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 9RS, UK. tombooth@doctors.org.uk.
  • Brazil L; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  • Thompson G; Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital For Neurology and Neurosrgery, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
  • Daniel RA; Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  • Shuaib H; Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
  • Ashkan K; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  • Pandey A; Department of Medical Physics, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Eur Radiol ; 31(5): 2933-2943, 2021 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33151394
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

MRI remains the preferred imaging investigation for glioblastoma. Appropriate and timely neuroimaging in the follow-up period is considered to be important in making management decisions. There is a paucity of evidence-based information in current UK, European and international guidelines regarding the optimal timing and type of neuroimaging following initial neurosurgical treatment. This study assessed the current imaging practices amongst UK neuro-oncology centres, thus providing baseline data and informing future practice.

METHODS:

The lead neuro-oncologist, neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon from every UK neuro-oncology centre were invited to complete an online survey. Participants were asked about current and ideal imaging practices following initial treatment.

RESULTS:

Ninety-two participants from all 31 neuro-oncology centres completed the survey (100% response rate). Most centres routinely performed an early post-operative MRI (87%, 27/31), whereas only a third performed a pre-radiotherapy MRI (32%, 10/31). The number and timing of scans routinely performed during adjuvant TMZ treatment varied widely between centres. At the end of the adjuvant period, most centres performed an MRI (71%, 22/31), followed by monitoring scans at 3 monthly intervals (81%, 25/31). Additional short-interval imaging was carried out in cases of possible pseudoprogression in most centres (71%, 22/31). Routine use of advanced imaging was infrequent; however, the addition of advanced sequences was the most popular suggestion for ideal imaging practice, followed by changes in the timing of EPMRI.

CONCLUSION:

Variations in neuroimaging practices exist after initial glioblastoma treatment within the UK. Multicentre, longitudinal, prospective trials are needed to define the optimal imaging schedule for assessment. KEY POINTS • Variations in imaging practices exist in the frequency, timing and type of interval neuroimaging after initial treatment of glioblastoma within the UK. • Large, multicentre, longitudinal, prospective trials are needed to define the optimal imaging schedule for assessment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Glioblastoma Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Glioblastoma Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Year: 2021 Type: Article