Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Circulating Cell-Free DNA Correlates with Body Integral Dose and Radiation Modality in Prostate Cancer.
Lockney, Natalie A; Henderson, Randal; Swarts, Steven G; Zhang, Zhenhuan; Zhang, Bingrong; Li, Jennifer; Zlotecki, Robert A; Morris, Christopher G; Casey-Sawicki, Katherine; Okunieff, Paul.
Affiliation
  • Lockney NA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Henderson R; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Swarts SG; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Zhang Z; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Zhang B; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Li J; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Zlotecki RA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Morris CG; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Casey-Sawicki K; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Okunieff P; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Int J Part Ther ; 7(2): 21-30, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33274254
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The RadTox assay measures circulating cell-free DNA released in response to radiotherapy (RT)-induced tissue damage. The primary objectives for this clinical trial were to determine whether cell-free DNA numbers measured by the RadTox assay are (1) correlated with body integral dose, (2) lower with proton RT compared with photon RT, and (3) higher with larger prostate cancer RT fields. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients planned to receive proton or photon RT for nonmetastatic prostate cancer in the setting of an intact prostate or postprostatectomy were eligible for the trial. Plasma was collected pre-RT and at 5 additional daily collection points beginning 24 hours after the initiation of RT. Data from 54 evaluable patients were analyzed to examine any correlations among RadTox scores with body-integral dose, RT modality (photon versus proton), and RT field size (prostate or prostate bed versus whole pelvis).

RESULTS:

Body integral dose was significantly associated with the peak post-RT RadTox score (P = .04). Patients who received photon RT had a significant increase in peak post-RT RadTox score (P = .04), average post-RT RadTox score (P = .04), and day-2 RadTox score (all minus the pre-RT values for each patient) as compared with patients who received proton RT. Field size was not significantly associated with RadTox score.

CONCLUSION:

RadTox is correlated with body integral dose and correctly predicts which patients receive proton versus photon RT. Data collection remains ongoing for patient-reported RT toxicity outcomes to determine whether RadTox scores are correlated with toxicity.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Year: 2020 Type: Article