Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of manual K-files and reciprocating files in glide path preparation: a micro-computed tomography study of constricted canals.
Liu, Jing-Yi; Zhou, Zhi-Xiong; Tseng, Wei-Ju; Karabucak, Bekir.
Affiliation
  • Liu JY; Center of Dental Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Ying-Hua-Yuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. liujingyizzx@163.com.
  • Zhou ZX; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, 22 South Zhongguancun Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
  • Tseng WJ; Department of Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 240 S 40th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Karabucak B; Department of Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 240 S 40th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
BMC Oral Health ; 21(1): 83, 2021 02 23.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622296
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Optimum Glide Path (OGP) is a new reciprocating motion aiming to perform efficient glide path preparation in constricted canals. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare manual and OGP movement in terms of canal transportation and centering ability in glide path preparation of constricted canals.

METHODS:

Thirty constricted mesial root canals of mandibular molars, with initial apical size no larger than ISO#8, were selected and negotiated with #6-#8 K-files under the microscope. Canals were randomly divided into two experimental groups Group 1 (MAN, n = 15) Glide path was established by using #10-#15 stainless steel K-files manually; Group 2 (OGP, n = 15) #10-#15 Mechanical Glide Path super-files were used with OGP motion (OGP 90°, 300 rpm). Each instrument was used to prepare only 2 canals (as in one mesial root). Canals were scanned before and after glide path preparation with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to evaluate root canal transportation and centering ratio at 1, 3 and 5 mm levels from the root apex. File distortions and separations were recorded. Paired t-test was used to statistically evaluate the data (P < .05).

RESULTS:

Group 2 showed a significantly lower transportation value than group 1 at 1-mm and 3-mm levels (P < .05), however the difference at 5-mm level was not significant. There was no significant difference regarding the centering ratio between the groups. Six #10 K-files were severely distorted in group 1, while no file separation or distortion was found in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS:

OGP motion performed significantly less canal transportation (apical 3 mm) and file distortion during glide path establishment in constricted canals comparing to manual motion, while the centering ability between the two was similar. CLINICAL RELEVANCE OGP reciprocating motion provides a safer and efficient clinical approach compared to traditional manual motion in glide path establishment with small files in constricted canals.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Root Canal Preparation / Dental Pulp Cavity Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Root Canal Preparation / Dental Pulp Cavity Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2021 Type: Article