Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The value of AGR2 and KRT5 as an immunomarker combination in distinguishing lung squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma.
Pan, Bo; Wei, Zi-Xin; Zhang, Ju-Xuan; Li, Xin; Meng, Qing-Wei; Cao, Ying-Yue; Qi, Li-Shuang; Yu, Yan.
Affiliation
  • Pan B; Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin, China.
  • Wei ZX; Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin, China.
  • Zhang JX; College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University Harbin, China.
  • Li X; College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University Harbin, China.
  • Meng QW; Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin, China.
  • Cao YY; Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin, China.
  • Qi LS; College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University Harbin, China.
  • Yu Y; Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin, China.
Am J Transl Res ; 13(5): 4464-4476, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34150027
With the advancement of tumor subtype-specific treatments, precise histopathologic distinction between adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is of significant clinical importance. Nevertheless, the current markers are insufficiently precise in poorly differentiated tissue. This study aimed to establish a histology-specific immunomarker combination to subclassify non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens. Based on previous work, we assessed the differential expression of anterior gradient 2 (AGR2) and keratin 5 (KRT5) in ADC and SCC by analyzing public datasets and postoperative specimens. Subsequently, we established a train set (n = 188) and a validation set (n = 42) comprised of NSCLC surgical specimens for training and verifying the subtype-identification capabilities of the two biomarkers separately and in combination, and contrasted the diagnostic utility of AGR2-KRT5 with that of the classic immunomarker combination, TTF1-P40. Differential expression of the two genes was statistically significant in ADC and SCC samples, both at the mRNA and protein levels. The specificity and sensitivity of AGR2 to detect ADC in the training set were 97.0% and 94.4%, while the sensitivity and specificity of KRT5 to determine SCC were 93.9% and 98.9%, respectively. The accuracies of AGR2-KRT5 in ADC, SCC, and across all samples were 93.3%, 92.0% and 92.6% respectively. In the validation cohort, the predictive accuracy of AGR2-KRT5 was up to 100% for ADC and 86.7% for SCC. Compared with TTF1-P40 in ADC samples, AGR2-KRT5 had 8.4% higher accuracy. In summary, the AGR2-KRT5 immunomarker combination reliably distinguished SCC from ADC, and was more accurate than TTF1-P40 in ADC.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Year: 2021 Type: Article