Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of Educational Print Materials for Physical Activity in Cancer: Evaluation of Readability and Suitability.
Avancini, Alice; Benato, Giulia; Tregnago, Daniela; Trestini, Ilaria; Milella, Michele; Lanza, Massimo; Pilotto, Sara.
Affiliation
  • Avancini A; Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Benato G; Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Tregnago D; Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Trestini I; Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Milella M; Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Lanza M; Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Pilotto S; Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. sara.pilotto@univr.it.
J Cancer Educ ; 38(1): 42-49, 2023 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34523076
ABSTRACT
Educational health materials may be important tools to increase physical activity in cancer patients. Nevertheless, most of the available resources regarding physical activity for cancer patients were found not suitable, had a low grade of readability, and thus, represent a significant barrier to behavior change. To date, little data about development criteria and evaluation of physical activity resources for cancer before their spread exist. The purposes of this study were (i) to describe the development of a physical activity guidebook designed for cancer patients and (ii) to test its readability and suitability. The guidebook was developed through multi-step passages, including group discussions, a literature review, identification of a motivational theory, and using previous research on exercise preferences, barriers, and facilitators to target the information. Two validated formulae were used to assess the readability, whereas thirty-four judges completed the Suitability of Assessment Materials questionnaire to evaluate the suitability of the guidebook. The guidebook was found readable for patients having at least a primary education, and the judges scored it as "superior" material. Our guidebook, following a rigorous method in the development phase, was considered to be suitable and readable. Further evaluations through clinical trials could investigate its effectiveness for behavior change and its impact on cancer patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Literacy / Neoplasms Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Literacy / Neoplasms Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2023 Type: Article