Reliability of the longitudinal experts all data (LEAD) methodology for determining the presence of elder mistreatment.
J Elder Abuse Negl
; 33(5): 385-397, 2021.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34878355
ABSTRACT
Developing reliable screening tools to identify elder mistreatment requires an accurate and reproducible reference standard. This study sought to investigate the reliability of the Longitudinal, Experts, All Data (LEAD) methodology as a reference standard in confirming presence of elder mistreatment. We analyzed data from a large, emergency department-based study that used a LEAD panel to determine the reference standard. For this study, a second, blinded LEAD panel reviewed clinical material for 40 patients. For each panel, five content experts voted on whether elder mistreatment was present. We found moderate agreement between the two LEAD panels in determining presence of elder mistreatment 85% agreement; k = 0.58; 95% Confidence Interval 0.28-0.87. Individual raters for both LEAD panels reported being mostly certain or certain >90% of votes. Efforts to further characterize and improve the reliability of the LEAD methodology in this context are warranted.
Key words
Full text:
1
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Elder Abuse
Type of study:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Screening_studies
Limits:
Aged
/
Humans
Language:
En
Year:
2021
Type:
Article