Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Morphologic reproducibility in 6 regions of the 3-dimensional facial models acquired by a standardized procedure: An in vivo study.
Wang, Xin-Wen; Liu, Zi-Jin; Diao, Jing; Zhao, Yi-Jiao; Jiang, Jiu-Hui.
Affiliation
  • Wang XW; Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Liu ZJ; Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Diao J; Department of Preventive Medicine, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Zhao YJ; National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Jiang JH; Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China. Electronic address: drjiangw@163.com.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 161(3): e287-e295, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924284
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A standardized procedure was proposed to control involuntary motion and other factors during the capture of structural light scanning that could influence the morphology of 3-dimensional facial models; interoperator reproducibility was evaluated.

METHODS:

Twenty subjects volunteered for facial scanning. Three researchers scanned each volunteer 3 times on the same day using the FaceScan structural light scanning system (Isravision, Darmstadt, Germany) and after the proposed procedure. Captures were done at 5-minute intervals. The 3 facial scans acquired by the same researcher were compared by reverse engineering software (Geomagic; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC). Six facial regions, including forehead, nose, paranasal, upper lip, lower lip and chin, and cheek, were divided. With the first scan as a reference, the other 2 scans were registered, and surface-to-surface distance maps were acquired to calculate the mean, standard deviation, and root mean squares (RMS) between 2 surfaces. The reproducibility between 3 researchers was then evaluated by a 1-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS:

The mean of 6 facial regions was close to 0. The RMS of lip regions were largest (0.48-0.53 mm), the forehead was smallest (0.21 mm), and the others ranged 0.37 mm to 0.42 mm. The standard deviation was slightly smaller than RMS and had the same trend of change. There was no significant difference in RMS among the 3 researchers (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

With the constraint of the standardized procedure, the morphologic reproducibility of facial models in 6 regions was satisfying.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Face Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Face Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article