Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing Cervicothoracic Junction Biomechanics after C7 Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: A Cadaveric Study of Stability and Rod Strain.
Godzik, Jakub; Lehrman, Jennifer N; Farber, S Harrison; de Andrada Pereira, Bernardo; Sawa, Anna G U; Ames, Christopher P; Koller, Heiko; Lee, Kevin; Turner, Jay D; Kelly, Brian P.
Affiliation
  • Godzik J; Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Lehrman JN; Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Farber SH; Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • de Andrada Pereira B; Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Sawa AGU; Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Ames CP; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Koller H; Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Lee K; DePuySynthes Spine Inc., Raynham, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Turner JD; Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Kelly BP; Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Electronic address: Neuropub@barrowneuro.org.
World Neurosurg ; 160: e278-e287, 2022 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34999263
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare biomechanical stability and rod strain among uniform rod (UR), tapered rod (TR), and UR+accessory rod (AR) constructs in a human cadaveric C7 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) model of cervical deformity correction.

METHODS:

Fourteen human cadaveric C2-T4 specimens were divided into 2 statistically equivalent groups. Specimens were instrumented from C2 to T3, and a 25° PSO was performed at C7. Group 1 was instrumented with 3.5-mm to 5.5-mm titanium TRs, and group 2 received 4.0-mm titanium URs. The UR group was also tested with lateral 4.0-mm titanium ARs (UR+AR) at C5-T2. All conditions were tested with 2.0 Nm pure moment and 70 N compressive load. Intervertebral range of motion (ROM) and posterior rod strain (pRS) were measured at C2-C3, T2-T3, and the PSO level. Statistical comparisons used 1-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS:

ROM was significantly reduced in the TR versus UR construct for right axial rotation (P = 0.04) at the PSO level; ROM with TR was significantly greater than with UR and UR+AR in compression (P ≤ 0.02). At the PSO level, pRS was significantly greater in TR than in UR+AR in flexion, extension, and right axial rotation (P ≤ 0.02). At T2/3, pRS was higher in UR than TR in left axial rotation (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS:

C7 PSO is highly destabilizing. Maximal rod strain was concentrated across the PSO and the cranial fixation site. TR provided higher stability than did UR in 1 direction of movement; however, UR+AR provided the greatest reduction of pRS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article