Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open-labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX).
Zhu, Xiao-Dong; Huang, Ming-Zhu; Wang, Yu-Sheng; Feng, Wan-Jing; Chen, Zhi-Yu; He, Yi-Fu; Zhang, Xiao-Wei; Liu, Xin; Wang, Chen-Chen; Zhang, Wen; Ying, Jie-Er; Wu, Jun; Yang, Lei; Qin, Yan-Ru; Luo, Jian-Feng; Zhao, Xiao-Ying; Li, Wen-Hua; Zhang, Zhe; Qiu, Li-Xin; Geng, Qi-Rong; Zou, Jian-Ling; Zhang, Jie-Yun; Zheng, Hong; Song, Xue-Feng; Wu, Shu-Sheng; Zhang, Cheng-Yan; Gong, Zhe; Liu, Qin-Qin; Wang, Xiao-Feng; Xu, Qi; Wang, Qi; Ji, Jian-Mei; Zhao, Jian; Guo, Wei-Jian.
Affiliation
  • Zhu XD; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Huang MZ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Wang YS; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Feng WJ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Chen ZY; Department of Gastroenterology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030013, P. R. China.
  • He YF; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Zhang XW; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Liu X; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Wang CC; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Zhang W; Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Division of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230031, P. R. China.
  • Ying JE; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Wu J; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Yang L; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Qin YR; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Luo JF; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Zhao XY; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Li WH; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Zhang Z; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Qiu LX; Department of Abdominal Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (IBMC) Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310005, P. R. China.
  • Geng QR; Department of Medical Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213004, P. R. China.
  • Zou JL; Department of Gastroenterology, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226006, P. R. China.
  • Zhang JY; Department of Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, P. R. China.
  • Zheng H; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Song XF; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Wu SS; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Zhang CY; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Gong Z; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Liu QQ; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Wang XF; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Xu Q; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Wang Q; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Ji JM; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Zhao J; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
  • Guo WJ; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
Cancer Commun (Lond) ; 42(4): 314-326, 2022 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212487
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens in treating AGC.

METHODS:

This phase III trial enrolled previously untreated patients with AGC who were randomly assigned to receive the XELOX or EOX regimen. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority in progression-free survival (PFS) for XELOX as compared with EOX on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS:

Between April 10, 2015 and August 20, 2020, 448 AGC patients were randomized to receive XELOX (n = 222) or EOX (n = 226). The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5-6.0 months) in the XELOX arm and 5.5 months (95% CI = 5.0-6.0 months) in the EOX arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.989, 95% CI = 0.812-1.203; Pnon-inferiority = 0.003). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (mOS) (12.0 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.384) or objective response rate (37.4% vs. 45.1%, P = 0.291) between the two groups. In patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis, the EOX arm had a significantly longer mOS (P = 0.021) and a trend of longer mPFS (P = 0.073) than the XELOX arm. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 42.2% (90/213) in the XELOX arm and 72.5% (156/215) in the EOX arm (P = 0.001). The global health-related quality of life (QoL) score was significantly higher in the XELOX arm than in the EOX arm during chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

This non-inferiority trial demonstrated that the doublet regimen was as effective as the triplet regimen and had a better safety profile and QoL as a first-line treatment for AGC patients. However, the triplet regimen might have a survival advantage in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / Adenocarcinoma / Liver Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / Adenocarcinoma / Liver Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article