Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benchmarking the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Multiple Mitochondrial DNA Variant Callers: Practical Implications for Clinical Application.
Ip, Eddie K K; Troup, Michael; Xu, Colin; Winlaw, David S; Dunwoodie, Sally L; Giannoulatou, Eleni.
Affiliation
  • Ip EKK; Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Troup M; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Xu C; Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Winlaw DS; School of Computer Science and Engineering, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Dunwoodie SL; Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centre, Heart Institute, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
  • Giannoulatou E; Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Genet ; 13: 692257, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35350246
ABSTRACT
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations contribute to human disease across a range of severity, from rare, highly penetrant mutations causal for monogenic disorders to mutations with milder contributions to phenotypes. mtDNA variation can exist in all copies of mtDNA or in a percentage of mtDNA copies and can be detected with levels as low as 1%. The large number of copies of mtDNA and the possibility of multiple alternative alleles at the same DNA nucleotide position make the task of identifying allelic variation in mtDNA very challenging. In recent years, specialized variant calling algorithms have been developed that are tailored to identify mtDNA variation from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. However, very few studies have systematically evaluated and compared these methods for the detection of both homoplasmy and heteroplasmy. A publicly available synthetic gold standard dataset was used to assess four mtDNA variant callers (Mutserve, mitoCaller, MitoSeek, and MToolBox), and the commonly used Genome Analysis Toolkit "best practices" pipeline, which is included in most current WGS pipelines. We also used WGS data from 126 trios and calculated the percentage of maternally inherited variants as a metric of calling accuracy, especially for homoplasmic variants. We additionally compared multiple pathogenicity prediction resources for mtDNA variants. Although the accuracy of homoplasmic variant detection was high for the majority of the callers with high concordance across callers, we found a very low concordance rate between mtDNA variant callers for heteroplasmic variants ranging from 2.8% to 3.6%, for heteroplasmy thresholds of 5% and 1%. Overall, Mutserve showed the best performance using the synthetic benchmark dataset. The analysis of mtDNA pathogenicity resources also showed low concordance in prediction results. We have shown that while homoplasmic variant calling is consistent between callers, there remains a significant discrepancy in heteroplasmic variant calling. We found that resources like population frequency databases and pathogenicity predictors are now available for variant annotation but still need refinement and improvement. With its peculiarities, the mitochondria require special considerations, and we advocate that caution needs to be taken when analyzing mtDNA data from WGS data.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article