Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single- and Multi-Joint Maximum Weight Lifting Relationship to Free-Fat Mass in Different Exercises for Upper- and Lower-Limbs in Well-Trained Male Young Adults.
Massini, Danilo A; Macedo, Anderson G; Almeida, Tiago A F; Espada, Mário C; Santos, Fernando J; Castro, Eliane A; Ferreira, Daniel C P; Neiva, Cassiano M; Pessôa Filho, Dalton M.
Affiliation
  • Massini DA; Graduate Programme in Human Development and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro 13506-900, Brazil.
  • Macedo AG; Graduate Programme in Human Development and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro 13506-900, Brazil.
  • Almeida TAF; Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru 17033-360, Brazil.
  • Espada MC; Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru 17033-360, Brazil.
  • Santos FJ; School of Education, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, 2914-504 Setubal, Portugal.
  • Castro EA; Life Quality Research Centre, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
  • Ferreira DCP; School of Education, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, 2914-504 Setubal, Portugal.
  • Neiva CM; Life Quality Research Centre, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
  • Pessôa Filho DM; Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, 1499-002 Lisbon, Portugal.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35409702
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to analyze whether the relationship between regional and whole-body fat-free mass (FFM) and strength is related to FFM distribution and area according to limb involvement. Thirty well-trained male young adults underwent one-repetition maximum test (1RM) to assess the strength in arm curl (AC), bench press (BP), seated row (SR), leg press 45° (LP45), knee extension (KE), and leg curl (LC). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to evaluate FFM. The values for 1RM in AC, BP, and R correlated to FFM in upper limb (R2 = 0.69, 0.84 and 0.75), without an effect of appendicular mass index (API) or area. For 1RM in KE, the correlation with FFM in lower limb increased with thigh area (R2 = 0.56), whereas 1RM in LC and LP45 correlation to whole-body FFM increased with API (R2 = 0.64 and 0.49). The upper limb's FFM may be reliable for indexing the arms and upper trunk strengths, whereas the relationships between FFM and strength in lower limb improve as muscle mass and thigh area increases between subjects.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Weight Lifting / Muscle Strength Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Weight Lifting / Muscle Strength Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article