Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Samborski, S Andrew; Haws, Brittany E; Karnyski, Steven; Soles, Gillian; Gorczyca, John T; Nicandri, Gregg; Voloshin, Ilya; Ketz, John P.
Affiliation
  • Samborski SA; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Haws BE; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Karnyski S; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Soles G; Department of Orthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Gorczyca JT; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Nicandri G; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Voloshin I; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Ketz JP; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
JSES Int ; 6(5): 755-762, 2022 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36081702
ABSTRACT

Background:

This study compares patient-reported outcomes and range of motion (ROM) between adults with an AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type C proximal humerus fracture managed nonoperatively, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

Methods:

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients >60 years of age treated with nonoperative management, ORIF, or RSA for AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures from 2015 to 2018. Visual analog scale pain scores, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, ROM values, and complication and reoperation rates were compared using analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi square analysis for categorical variables.

Results:

A total of 88 patients were included 41 nonoperative, 23 ORIF, and 24 RSA. At the 2-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale scores and lower PROMIS pain interference scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale, PROMIS pain interference, and PF scores and better ROM (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 3-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS pain interference and PF scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS PF scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. There was a significantly higher complication rate in the ORIF group than in the non-operative and RSA groups (P < .05).

Conclusion:

The management of AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures in older adults with RSA or ORIF led to early decreased pain and improved physical function and ROM compared to nonoperative management at the expense of a higher complication rate in the ORIF group.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Year: 2022 Type: Article