Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antegrade Posterior Column Acetabulum Fracture Screw Fixation via Posterior Approach: A Biomechanical Comparative Study.
Berk, Till; Zderic, Ivan; Schwarzenberg, Peter; Drenchev, Ludmil; Skulev, Hristo Kostov; Pfeifer, Roman; Pastor, Tatjana; Richards, Geoff; Gueorguiev, Boyko; Pape, Hans-Christoph.
Affiliation
  • Berk T; AO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
  • Zderic I; Department of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Schwarzenberg P; Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopedic and Trauma Research, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Drenchev L; AO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
  • Skulev HK; AO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
  • Pfeifer R; Institute of Metal Science ''Acad. A. Balevski'', Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1574 Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • Pastor T; Institute of Metal Science ''Acad. A. Balevski'', Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1574 Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • Richards G; Department of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Gueorguiev B; AO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
  • Pape HC; Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(7)2023 Jun 28.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37512026
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Minimally invasive surgeries for acetabulum fracture fixation are gaining popularity due to their known advantages versus open reduction and internal fixation. Antegrade or retrograde screw fixation along the long axis of the posterior column of the acetabulum is increasingly applied in surgical practice. While there is sufficient justification in the literature for the application of the anterior approach, there is a deficit of reports related to the posterior approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical competence of posterior column acetabulum fracture fixation through antegrade screw placement using either a standard cannulated screw or a cannulated compression headless screw (CCHS) via posterior approach. Materials and

Methods:

Eight composite pelvises were used, and a posterior column acetabulum fracture according to the Letournel Classification was simulated on both their left and right sides via an osteotomy. The sixteen hemi-pelvic specimens were assigned to two groups (n = 8) for either posterior column standard screw (group PCSS) or posterior column CCHS (group PCCH) fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed by applying steadily increased cyclic load until failure. Interfragmentary movements were investigated by means of motion tracking.

Results:

Initial stiffness demonstrated significantly higher values in PCCH (163.1 ± 14.9 N/mm) versus PCSS (133.1 ± 27.5 N/mm), p = 0.024. Similarly, cycles and load at failure were significantly higher in PCCH (7176.7 ± 2057.0 and 917.7 ± 205.7 N) versus PCSS (3661.8 ± 1664.5 and 566.2 ± 166.5 N), p = 0.002.

Conclusion:

From a biomechanical perspective, CCHS fixation demonstrates superior stability and could be a valuable alternative option to the standard cannulated screw fixation of posterior column acetabulum fractures, thus increasing the confidence in postoperative full weight bearing for both the patient and treating surgeon. Whether uneventful immediate postoperative full weight bearing can be achieved with CCHS fixation should primarily be investigated in further human cadaveric studies with a larger sample size.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fractures / Fractures, Bone / Hip Fractures Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fractures / Fractures, Bone / Hip Fractures Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2023 Type: Article