Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of a new implant system and drilling protocol-A minipig intraoral dental implant model study.
Musskopf, Marta Liliana; Finger Stadler, Amanda; Fiorini, Tiago; Ramos, Umberto Demoner; de Sousa Rabelo, Mariana; de Castro Pinto, Rodrigo Nahas; Susin, Cristiano.
Affiliation
  • Musskopf ML; Laboratory for Applied Periodontal & Craniofacial Research, Division of Comprehensive Oral Health - Periodontology, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Finger Stadler A; Laboratory for Applied Periodontal & Craniofacial Research, Division of Comprehensive Oral Health - Periodontology, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Fiorini T; Department of Conservative Dentistry - Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Ramos UD; Private Practice, Vitoria, Brazil.
  • de Sousa Rabelo M; Private Practice, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Castro Pinto RN; Private Practice, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Susin C; FUNDECTO, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 35(1): 40-51, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37855174
ABSTRACT

AIM:

A new implant system encompassing implants with a tri-oval cross-sectional design and a simplified site preparation protocol at low speed and no irrigation has been developed. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the new implant system using the minipig intraoral dental implant model.

METHODS:

Eight Yucatan minipigs were included. Twelve weeks after extractions, four implants per animal were randomly placed and allowed to heal transmucosal for 13 weeks two Ø3.5 × 10 mm implants with a back-tapered collar and circular cross-section (control) and two Ø3.5 × 11 mm implants with tri-oval collar and cross-section (test). MicroCT and histological analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

Thirty-two implants were placed; one implant for the control group was lost. Histologically, BIC was higher in the test compared with the control group (74.1% vs. 60.9%, p < .001). At the platform level, inflammation was statistically significantly higher albeit mild in the test compared with the control group. No other significant differences were observed between groups. MicroCT analysis showed that bone-to-implant-contact (BIC) and trabecular thickness were statistically significantly higher for the test than the control group. Test group had significantly higher first BIC distance than controls on lingual sites.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study results support the safety and efficacy of the new dental implant system and simplified site preparation protocol; human studies should be carried out to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Implants / Dental Implantation, Endosseous Limits: Animals Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Implants / Dental Implantation, Endosseous Limits: Animals Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article