Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Multicenter Study Validates the WHO 2022 Classification for Conjunctival Melanocytic Intraepithelial Lesions With Clinical and Prognostic Relevance.
Mudhar, Hardeep Singh; Krishna, Yamini; Cross, Simon; Auw-Haedrich, Claudia; Barnhill, Raymond; Cherepanoff, Svetlana; Eagle, Ralph; Farmer, James; Folberg, Robert; Grossniklaus, Hans; Herwig-Carl, Martina C; Hyrcza, Martin; Lassalle, Sandra; Loeffler, Karin U; Moulin, Alexandre; Milman, Tatyana; Verdijk, Robert M; Heegaard, Steffen; Coupland, Sarah E.
Affiliation
  • Mudhar HS; National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Department of Histopathology, E-Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
  • Krishna Y; National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology
  • Cross S; Academic Unit of Pathology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Auw-Haedrich C; Eye Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Barnhill R; Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences and Lettres Research University, and Faculty of Medicine University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  • Cherepanoff S; Sydpath, Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Eagle R; Department of Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Farmer J; Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Folberg R; Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan; Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
  • Grossniklaus H; Department of Ophthalmology, Ocular Oncology and Pathology Section, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Herwig-Carl MC; Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmic Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Hyrcza M; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Lassalle S; Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Hospital-Related Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Pasteur Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice and Institute of Research on Cancer and Aging, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Loeffler KU; Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmic Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Moulin A; Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Milman T; Department of Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Verdijk RM; Department of Pathology, Section of Ophthalmic Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Heegaard S; Department of Pathology, Eye Pathology Section, and Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Coupland SE; National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of System Molecular and Integrative Biology
Lab Invest ; 104(1): 100281, 2024 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37924948
ABSTRACT
Several nomenclature and grading systems have been proposed for conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesions (C-MIL). The fourth "WHO Classification of Eye Tumors" (WHO-EYE04) proposed a C-MIL classification, capturing the progression of noninvasive neoplastic melanocytes from low- to high-grade lesions, onto melanoma in situ (MIS), and then to invasive melanoma. This proposal was revised to the WHO-EYE05 C-MIL system, which simplified the high-grade C-MIL, whereby MIS was subsumed into high-grade C-MIL. Our aim was to validate the WHO-EYE05 C-MIL system using digitized images of C-MIL, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry. However, C-MIL cases were retrieved from 3 supraregional ocular pathology centers. Adequate conjunctival biopsies were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Melan-A, SOX10, and PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma. Digitized slides were uploaded on the SmartZoom platform and independently scored by 4 ocular pathologists to obtain a consensus score, before circulating to 14 expert eye pathologists for independent scoring. In total, 105 cases from 97 patients were evaluated. The initial consensus diagnoses using the WHO-EYE04 C-MIL system were as follows 28 benign conjunctival melanoses, 13 low-grade C-MIL, 37 high-grade C-MIL, and 27 conjunctival MIS. Using this system resulted in 93% of the pathologists showing only fair-to-moderate agreement (kappa statistic) with the consensus score. The WHO-EYE05 C-MIL system (with high-grade C-MIL and MIS combined) improved consistency between pathologists, with the greatest level of agreement being seen with benign melanosis (74.5%) and high-grade C-MIL (85.4%). Lowest agreements remained between pathologists for low-grade C-MIL (38.7%). Regarding WHO-EYE05 C-MIL scoring and clinical outcomes, local recurrences of noninvasive lesions developed in 8% and 34% of the low- and high-grade cases. Invasive melanoma only occurred in 47% of the cases that were assessed as high-grade C-MIL. This extensive international collaborative study is the first to undertake a comprehensive review of the WHO-EYE05 C-MIL scoring system, which showed good interobserver agreement and reproducibility.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Neoplasms / Melanoma / Melanosis Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Neoplasms / Melanoma / Melanosis Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article