Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected mucinous cystic neoplasms of the liver: a retrospective cohort study.
Furumaya, Alicia; Schulz, Hannah H; Verheij, Joanne; Takkenberg, R Bart; Besselink, Marc G; Kazemier, Geert; Erdmann, Joris I; van Delden, Otto M.
Affiliation
  • Furumaya A; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. a.furumaya@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Schulz HH; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands. a.furumaya@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Verheij J; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands. h.h.schulz@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Takkenberg RB; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiology, Location University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands. h.h.schulz@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Besselink MG; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Kazemier G; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Pathology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Erdmann JI; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • van Delden OM; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 66, 2024 Feb 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368313
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the liver (MCN-L) are hepatic cysts with a low malignant potential. The recent European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines provide guidance on the imaging features and surgical management of MCN-L, yet are hampered by a lack of studies adhering to the revised World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. This study attempted to validate the new 2022 EASL-guidelines in a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgery for suspected MCN-L.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing surgery for suspected MCN-L in a single center between 2010 and 2020 were included. Imaging features were assessed according to the EASL guidelines and were compared to final pathological diagnoses, according to the WHO criteria.

RESULTS:

In total, 35 patients were included. In three patients, there were no worrisome imaging features, yet final pathological diagnosis showed MCN-L. Contrarily, six patients with worrisome imaging features did not have MCN-L. Five patients were diagnosed with MCN-L on final pathology. The sensitivity of the EASL-guidelines for the diagnosis of MCN-L was 40% (95%CI 5.3-85%) and the specificity was 80% (95% CI 61-92%).

CONCLUSION:

Although the new EASL-guidelines provide some guidance, they could not reliably distinguish MCN-L from other cysts in our series. Thus, preoperative diagnosis of MCN-L remains challenging and we should be careful in selecting surgical strategies based on these criteria.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Neoplasms / Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous / Cysts / Liver Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Neoplasms / Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous / Cysts / Liver Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article