Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sodium citrate versus sodium bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial.
Sorohan, Bogdan Marian; Obrișca, Bogdan; Jurubița, Roxana; Lupușoru, Gabriela; Achim, Camelia; Andronesi, Andreea; Frațila, Georgiana; Berechet, Andreea; Micu, Georgia; Ismail, Gener.
Affiliation
  • Sorohan BM; "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Obrișca B; Fundeni Clinical Institute, Department of Kidney Transplantation, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Jurubița R; "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Lupușoru G; Fundeni Clinical Institute, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Achim C; "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Andronesi A; Fundeni Clinical Institute, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Frațila G; "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Berechet A; Fundeni Clinical Institute, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Micu G; "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Ismail G; Fundeni Clinical Institute, Department of Nephrology, Bucharest, Romania.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(10): e37475, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457574
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Metabolic acidosis (MA) is frequently associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Our aim was to compare the effect of oral sodium citrate (SC) with that of oral sodium bicarbonate (SB) on renal function and serum bicarbonate correction, as well as to evaluate their safety profile in patients with MA of CKD.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective, single-center, randomized 11, parallel, controlled, unblinded clinical trial of 124 patients with MA and CKD stages 3b and 4. The primary outcome was the mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The secondary outcomes were mean change in serum bicarbonate level, eGFR decrease by 30%, eGFR decrease by 50%, dialysis, death or prolonged hospitalization, and a combined endpoint.

RESULTS:

No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of mean eGFR change [adjusted mean difference = -0.99 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI -2.51 to 0.93, P = .20)]. We observed a mean serum bicarbonate change of 6.15 mmol/L [(95% CI 5.55-6.74), P < .001] in the SC group and of 6.19 mmol/L [(95% CI 5.54-6.83), P < .001] in the SB group, but no significant difference between the 2 groups [adjusted mean difference = 0.31 mmol/L (-0.22 to 0.85), P = .25]. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed similar risks regarding eGFR decrease by 30% (P = .77), eGFR decrease by 50% (P = .50), dialysis (P = .85), death or prolonged hospitalization (P = .29), and combined endpoint (P = .57). Study drug discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly more common in the SB group (17.7% vs 4.8%, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS:

SC and SB have a similar effect on kidney function decline, both improve serum bicarbonate level, but SB is associated with higher rates of medication discontinuation due to adverse events.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Acidosis / Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Acidosis / Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Limits: Humans Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article