Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pulmonary Artery Diastolic Pressure as a Surrogate for Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Cardiogenic Shock.
Papolos, Alexander I; Kenigsberg, Benjamin B; Singam, Narayana Sarma V; Berg, David D; Guo, Jianping; Bohula, Erin A; Katz, Jason N; Diepen, Sean VAN; Morrow, David A.
Affiliation
  • Papolos AI; Department of Critical Care and Division of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: Alexander.Papolos@MedStar.net.
  • Kenigsberg BB; Department of Critical Care and Division of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Singam NSV; Department of Critical Care and Division of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Berg DD; TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Guo J; TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Bohula EA; TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Katz JN; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Diepen SV; Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Morrow DA; TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Card Fail ; 30(6): 853-856, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38513886
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

It is common for clinicians to use the pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP) as a surrogate for the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). Here, we determine the validity of this relationship in patients with various phenotypes of cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS AND

RESULTS:

In this analysis of the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network registry, we identified 1225 people admitted with CS who received pulmonary artery catheters. Linear regression, Bland-Altman and receiver operator characteristic analyses were performed to determine the strength of the association between PADP and PCWP in patients with left-, right-, biventricular, and other non-myocardia phenotypes of CS (eg, arrhythmia, valvular stenosis, tamponade). There was a moderately strong correlation between PADP and PCWP in the total population (r = 0.64, n = 1225) and in each CS phenotype, except for right ventricular CS, for which the correlation was weak (r = 0.43, n = 71). Additionally, we found that a PADP ≥ 24 mmHg can be used to infer a PCWP ≥ 18 mmHg with ≥ 90% confidence in all but the right ventricular CS phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS:

This analysis validates the practice of using PADP as a surrogate for PCWP in most patients with CS; however, it should generally be avoided in cases of right ventricular-predominant CS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Artery / Shock, Cardiogenic / Pulmonary Wedge Pressure / Registries Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Artery / Shock, Cardiogenic / Pulmonary Wedge Pressure / Registries Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article