Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Standard versus fractionated high-dose cisplatin plus radiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: Results of the CisFRad (GORTEC 2015-02) randomized phase II trial.
Borel, Christian; Sun, Xu-Shan; Coutte, Alexandre; Bera, Guillaume; Sire, Christian; Zanetta, Sylvie; Alfonsi, Marc; Janoray, Guillaume; Chatellier, Thierry; Garcia-Ramirez, Muriel; Gherga, Elisabeta; Hammoud, Yasser; Burgy, Mickaël; Etienne-Selloum, Nelly; Pechery, Adeline; Girard-Calais, Marie-Hélène; Velten, Michel; Pignon, Jean-Pierre; Wanneveich, Mathilde; Bourhis, Jean.
Affiliation
  • Borel C; Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: c.borel@icans.eu.
  • Sun XS; Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Montbéliard, France; Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Coutte A; Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Amiens-Picardie-Site Sud, Amiens, France.
  • Bera G; Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France.
  • Sire C; Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France.
  • Zanetta S; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
  • Alfonsi M; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France.
  • Janoray G; Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, Tours, France.
  • Chatellier T; Centre d'Oncologie de l'Estuaire, Saint-Nazaire, France.
  • Garcia-Ramirez M; Hôpital Robert Boulin, Libourne, France.
  • Gherga E; Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Montbéliard, France.
  • Hammoud Y; Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Burgy M; Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France; Laboratory of Bioimaging and Pathology, University of Strasbourg, UMR7021 CNRS, Illkirch, France.
  • Etienne-Selloum N; Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France; Laboratory of Bioimaging and Pathology, University of Strasbourg, UMR7021 CNRS, Illkirch, France.
  • Pechery A; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou (GORTEC) - Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France.
  • Girard-Calais MH; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou (GORTEC) - Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France.
  • Velten M; Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France; Université de Strasbourg, UMR-S1113 IRFAC Inserm, Strasbourg, France.
  • Pignon JP; Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
  • Wanneveich M; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou (GORTEC) - Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France.
  • Bourhis J; CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Radiother Oncol ; 197: 110329, 2024 May 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768714
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin (HD-Cis 100 mg/m2 q3w for three cycles) is the standard of care (SOC) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Cumulative delivered dose of cisplatin is prognostic of survival, even beyond 200 mg/m2 but high toxicity compromises its delivery.

AIM:

Cisplatin fractionation may allow, by decreasing the peak serum concentration, to decrease toxicity. To date, no direct comparison was done of HD-Cis versus fractionated high dose cisplatin (FHD-Cis).

METHODS:

This is a multi-institutional randomized phase II trial, stratified on postoperative or definitive chemoradiotherapy, comparing HD-Cis to FHD-Cis (25 mg/m2/d d1-4 q3w for 3 cycles) in patients with LA-HNSCC. The primary endpoint was the cumulative delivered cisplatin dose.

RESULTS:

Between December 2015 and April 2018, 124 patients were randomized. Median cisplatin cumulative delivered dose was 291 mg/m2 (IQR 251;298) in the FHD-Cis arm and 274 mg/m2 (IQR 198;295) in the HD-Cis arm (P = 0.054). The proportion of patients receiving a third cycle of cisplatin was higher, with a lower proportion of grade 3-4 acute AEs in the FHD-Cis arm compared to the HD-Cis arm 81 % vs. 64 % (P = 0.04) and 10 % vs. 17 % (P = 0.002), respectively. With a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR 41;55), locoregional failure rate, PFS and OS were similar between the two arms.

CONCLUSION:

Although the primary endpoint was not met, FHD-Cis allowed more cycles of cisplatin to be delivered with lower toxicity, when compared to SOC. FHD-Cis concurrently with RT is a treatment option which deserves further consideration.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article