Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors in the Western Setting.
Morais, Rui; Amorim, José; Medas, Renato; Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo; Santos-Antunes, João; Legros, Romain; Albouys, Jérémie; Moll, Frédéric; Marques, Margarida; Vilas-Boas, Filipe; Rodrigues-Pinto, Eduardo; Gullo, Irene; Carneiro, Fátima; Soares, Elisa Gravito; Amaro, Pedro; Mesquita, Pedro; Rodrigues, Jaime; Andrisani, Gianluca; Sferrazza, Sandro; Archer, Sara; Kuttner-Magalhães, Ricardo; Manzano, Francisco; de Santiago, Enrique Rodríguez; Rimondi, Alessandro; Murino, Alberto; Despott, Edward; Pioche, Mathieu; Jacques, Jérémie; Macedo, Guilherme.
Affiliation
  • Morais R; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: u011791@chsj.min-saude.pt.
  • Amorim J; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Medas R; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Sousa-Pinto B; Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde/Rede de Investigação em Saúde, Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Po
  • Santos-Antunes J; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto/Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University
  • Legros R; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
  • Albouys J; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
  • Moll F; Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
  • Marques M; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Vilas-Boas F; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Rodrigues-Pinto E; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Gullo I; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto/Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São
  • Carneiro F; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto/Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São
  • Soares EG; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Amaro P; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Mesquita P; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
  • Rodrigues J; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
  • Andrisani G; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
  • Sferrazza S; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Ospedale Civico Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
  • Archer S; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Kuttner-Magalhães R; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Manzano F; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
  • de Santiago ER; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rimondi A; Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom.
  • Murino A; Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom.
  • Despott E; Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom.
  • Pioche M; Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
  • Jacques J; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
  • Macedo G; Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782173
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is established as the primary treatment modality for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs), but recently underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) has emerged as a potential alternative. The majority of previous studies focused on Asian populations and small lesions (≤20 mm). We aimed to compare the efficacy and outcomes of U-EMR vs C-EMR for SNADETs in a Western setting.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective multinational study from 10 European centers that performed both C-EMR and U-EMR between January 2013 and July 2023. The main outcomes were the technical success, procedure-related adverse events (AEs), and the residual/recurrent adenoma (RRA) rate, evaluated on a per-lesion basis. We assessed the association between the type of endoscopic mucosal resection and the occurrence of AEs or RRAs using mixed-effects logistic regression models (propensity scores). Sensitivity analyses were performed for lesions ≤20 mm or >20 mm.

RESULTS:

A total of 290 SNADETs submitted to endoscopic resection during the study period met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed (C-EMR n = 201, 69.3%; U-EMR n = 89, 30.7%). The overall technical success rate was 95.5% and comparable between groups. In logistic regression models, compared with U-EMR, C-EMR was associated with a significantly higher frequency of overall delayed AEs (odds ratio [OR], 4.95; 95% CI, 2.87-8.53), postprocedural bleeding (OR, 7.92; 95% CI, 3.95-15.89), and RRAs (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.49-5.37). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results when solely considering either small (≤20 mm) or large (>20 mm) lesions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with C-EMR, U-EMR was associated with a lower rate of overall AEs and RRAs, regardless of lesion size. Our results confirm the possible role of U-EMR as an effective and safe technique in the management of SNADETs.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article