Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of point-of-care gonorrhea and chlamydia testing in the emergency department on reducing overtreatment rates.
Feltes, Alaina; Combs, Julie; Reynolds, Maegan; Conroy, Mark; Lindsey, Sommer; Dick, Michael; Li, Junan; Reichert, Erin.
Affiliation
  • Feltes A; Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Combs J; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Reynolds M; Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Conroy M; Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Lindsey S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Ohio State East Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Dick M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Ohio State East Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Li J; The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Reichert E; Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: erin.reichert@osumc.edu.
Am J Emerg Med ; 83: 64-68, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968852
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections continue to increase in the United States. Advancement in technology with point-of-care (POC) testing can improve the overall treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STI) in the emergency department (ED) by shortening the time to test result and administration of accurate treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess if the POC test reduced the rate of overtreatment for CT and/or NG compared to the standard-of-care (SOC) test.

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients tested for CT and NG at two urban EDs between August 2020 and October 2022. This cohort excluded hospital admissions, elopement, pregnancy, rectal and oral samples, victims of sexual assault, and diagnoses for which antimicrobial treatment overlapped that of CT/NG. The primary outcome assessed overtreatment, defined as receiving treatment in the ED or a prescription prior to discharge for patients who tested negative for CT and/or NG. Secondary outcomes included undertreatment rates, overtreatment rates in select populations, test turnaround time, and ED length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS:

Of 327 patients screened, 97 patients were included in the SOC group and 100 in POC. Overtreatment for CT was provided in zero POC patients and 29 (29.9%) SOC patients (p < 0.001). NG was overtreated in 1 (1%) POC and 23 (23.7%) SOC (p < 0.001). POC was associated with undertreatment of CT and/or NG in two patients, compared to four patients tested with SOC. Overall, treatment was deemed inappropriate for 5 (5%) of those tested with POC, compared to 35 (36%) tested with SOC (p < 0.001). There was no difference in ED LOS (2.7 vs 3.01 h, p = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS:

POC testing facilitated the return of results prior to patients being discharged from the ED. Compared to standard testing, POC improved appropriateness of CT and NG treatment by reducing the rates of overtreatment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Chlamydia Infections / Gonorrhea / Emergency Service, Hospital / Medical Overuse / Point-of-Care Testing Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Chlamydia Infections / Gonorrhea / Emergency Service, Hospital / Medical Overuse / Point-of-Care Testing Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article