Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is the Number or Proximity of Margins Less than 2 mm Associated with an Increased Mastectomy Rate in Patients Attempting Breast Conservation Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?
Elmore, Leslie R; Bayley, Erin M; Clark, Beth Z; McAuliffe, Priscilla F; Cowher, Michael S.
Affiliation
  • Elmore LR; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Bayley EM; Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Clark BZ; Department of Pathology, Division of Breast and Gynecologic Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • McAuliffe PF; Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Cowher MS; Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. cowherms2@upmc.edu.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2024 Jul 31.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39085550
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Consensus guidelines recommend ≥ 2 mm margins in patients undergoing partial mastectomy (PM) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). It is unknown whether the number or proximity of margins less than 2 mm is associated with an increased mastectomy rate in patients attempting breast conservation therapy (BCT) for DCIS. The aim of this study is to examine this relationship. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

An institutional database review identified 208 patients with DCIS who underwent PM at a tertiary referral center and community hospitals from July 2020 to June 2023. Patients with a history of breast cancer, previous surgery for breast cancer, ipsilateral invasive carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, Paget's disease, more lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) than DCIS present, initial mastectomy, no DCIS present, routine shave margins (of all vectors), and ≥ 2 mm margins of all six vectors were excluded. Selective intraoperative margin re-excisions were included.

RESULTS:

A total of 208 patients who met inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. 122 (25%) had one close/positive (< 2 mm) margin and 86 (18%) had two or more close/positive margins. Of the patients with one close/positive margin, 7% (9/122) eventually underwent mastectomy. Of the patients with two or more close/positive margins, 20% (17/86) eventually underwent mastectomy. Overall, no patients with opposing margins underwent mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients undergoing PM for DCIS have a mastectomy rate that is increased threefold, with two or more close/positive margins at initial PM, when compared with those with only one close/positive margin. The presence of opposing close/positive margins at initial PM did not increase the mastectomy rate and most were cleared with re-excision.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Year: 2024 Type: Article