Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus current treatment continuation for maintenance therapy of HIV-1 infection: the KALESOLO trial.
Meynard, Jean-Luc; Bouteloup, Vincent; Landman, Roland; Bonnard, Philippe; Baillat, Vincent; Cabie, André; Kolta, Sami; Izopet, Jacques; Taburet, Anne-Marie; Mercie, Patrick; Chene, Geneviève; Girard, Pierre-Marie.
Afiliación
  • Meynard JL; Service des Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. jean-luc.meynard@sat.aphp.fr
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 65(11): 2436-44, 2010 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20843990
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We evaluated a monotherapy maintenance regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir versus continuing current combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) in HIV patients with suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This was an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre trial in 23 sites in France. Adults were randomized if they had no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for at least 6 months and did not change cART during the last 3 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 (non-inferiority margin set at -12%) with missing data and treatment modification considered as failure. The trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT00140751.

RESULTS:

At Week 48, 84% (73/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group [difference, -4.0%, lower limit of 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) for difference, -12.4%]. In secondary analysis with success defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL, 87% (76/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group were virologically suppressed compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, -0.5%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -8.5%). If antiretroviral treatment intensification was taken into account, 91% (79/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, +2.9%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -4.5%). Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not show acquired resistance mutations in the protease gene.

CONCLUSIONS:

Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not achieve non-inferiority versus cART for maintaining plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Nevertheless, the incidence of virological failure was low (mostly with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL) and easily managed by treatment intensification.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pirimidinonas / Infecciones por VIH / Ritonavir / Fármacos Anti-VIH Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pirimidinonas / Infecciones por VIH / Ritonavir / Fármacos Anti-VIH Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article