Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ACR Appropriateness Criteria®-Anal Cancer.
Hong, Theodore S; Pretz, Jennifer L; Herman, Joseph M; Abdel-Wahab, May; Azad, Nilofer; Blackstock, A William; Das, Prajnan; Goodman, Karyn A; Jabbour, Salma K; Jones, William E; Konski, Andre A; Koong, Albert C; Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel; Small, William; Thomas, Charles R; Zook, Jennifer; Suh, W Warren.
Afiliación
  • Hong TS; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Pretz JL; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Herman JM; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  • Abdel-Wahab M; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Azad N; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  • Blackstock AW; Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC.
  • Das P; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Goodman KA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Jabbour SK; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
  • Jones WE; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
  • Konski AA; Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI.
  • Koong AC; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
  • Rodriguez-Bigas M; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Small W; The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
  • Thomas CR; Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
  • Zook J; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Suh WW; Cancer Center of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.
Gastrointest Cancer Res ; 7(1): 4-14, 2014 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24558509
ABSTRACT
The management of anal cancer is driven by randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. However, trials may present conflicting conclusions. Furthermore, different clinical situations may not be addressed in certain trials because of eligibility inclusion criteria. Although prospective studies point to the use of definitive 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C-based chemoradiation as a standard, some areas remain that are not well defined. In particular, management of very early stage disease, radiation dose, and the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy remain unaddressed by phase III studies. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article