Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions.
Lee, Wan-Sun; Kim, Woong-Chul; Kim, Hae-Young; Kim, Wook-Tae; Kim, Ji-Hwan.
Afiliación
  • Lee WS; Department of Health Science, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim WC; Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HY; Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School & BK21+ Program in Public Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim WT; Department of Dental Laboratory, Sinheung University, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JH; Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Adv Prosthodont ; 6(1): 22-9, 2014 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24605202
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to investigate the potential clinical application of digitized silicone rubber impressions by comparing the accuracy of zirconia 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated from 2 types of data (working model and impression) obtained from a laser scanner. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Ten working models and impressions were prepared with epoxy resin and vinyl polysiloxane, respectively. Based on the data obtained from the laser scanner (D-700; 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), a total of 20 zirconia frameworks were prepared using a dental CAD/CAM system (DentalDesigner; 3shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark / Ener-mill, Dentaim, Seoul, Korea). The silicone replicas were sectioned into four pieces to evaluate the framework fit. The replicas were imaged using a digital microscope, and the fit of the reference points (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, and P7) were measured using the program in the device. Measured discrepancies were divided into 5 categories of gaps (MG, CG, AWG, AOTG, OG). Data were analyzed with Student's t-test (α=0.05), repeated measures ANOVA and two-way ANOVA (α=0.05).

RESULTS:

The mean gap of the zirconia framework prepared from the working models presented a narrower discrepancy than the frameworks fabricated from the impression bodies. The mean of the total gap in premolars (P=.003) and molars (P=.002) exhibited a statistical difference between two groups.

CONCLUSION:

The mean gap dimensions of each category showed statistically significant difference. Nonetheless, the digitized impression bodies obtained with a laser scanner were applicable to clinical settings, considering the clinically acceptable marginal fit (120 µm).
Palabras clave