Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Primary endovascular treatment of post-irradiated carotid pseudoaneurysm at the skull base with the Pipeline embolization device.
Tsang, Anderson Chun-On; Leung, Kar-ming; Lee, Raymond; Lui, Wai-man; Leung, Gilberto Ka-Kit.
Afiliación
  • Tsang AC; Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Leung KM; Department of Neurosurgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Lee R; Department of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Lui WM; Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Leung GK; Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 7(8): 603-7, 2015 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24852405
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A post-irradiated carotid pseudoaneurysm at the skull base can cause life-threatening blowout syndrome. Conventional treatments include parent vessel occlusion, endovascular coiling or covered stenting. Use of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) for pseudoaneurysm exclusion at the skull base is not well described.

OBJECTIVE:

To report the clinical and angiographic outcome after using multiple PEDs to treat recently ruptured radiation-induced carotid pseudoaneurysms at the skull base.

METHODS:

Retrospective review of the clinical and angiographic records of patients who received PEDs as primary treatment for skull base carotid pseudoaneurysm between April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2013.

RESULTS:

Seven patients (five men, two women) with a mean age of 58 years (range 47-65) were treated in the study period. Primary treatment with the PED alone, with adjunct coil embolization in two patients, achieved immediate hemostasis in all patients, with no pseudoaneurysm rebleeding after a mean follow-up of 15.3 months (range 4-24 months). One patient had periprocedural cerebral infarction. Delayed internal carotid artery occlusion secondary to in-stent thrombosis occurred in three patients, one of whom had lacunar infarct and two remained asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS:

Endovascular treatment with the PED was effective in excluding skull base post-irradiated carotid pseudoaneurysms and preventing recurrent blowout. However, the risk of ischemic complications in this group of patients was high and our experience did not support the use of flow diverters as a first-line treatment for this condition.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Base del Cráneo / Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas / Embolización Terapéutica / Procedimientos Endovasculares Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Base del Cráneo / Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas / Embolización Terapéutica / Procedimientos Endovasculares Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article