Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prioritizing dermatoses: rationally selecting guideline topics.
Borgonjen, R J; van Everdingen, J J E; van de Kerkhof, P C M; Spuls, Ph I.
Afiliación
  • Borgonjen RJ; Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van Everdingen JJ; Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology, Domus Medica, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van de Kerkhof PC; Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Spuls PI; Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 29(8): 1636-40, 2015 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25175822
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinical practice guideline (CPG) development starts with selecting appropriate topics, as resources to develop a guideline are limited. However, a standardized method for topic selection is commonly missing and the way different criteria are used to prioritize is not clear.

OBJECTIVES:

To select and prioritize dermatological topics for CPG development and elucidate criteria dermatologists find important in selecting guideline topics.

METHODS:

All 410 dermatologists in the Netherlands were asked to create a top 20 of dermatological topics for which a guideline would be desirable, regardless of existing guidelines. They also rated, on a 5-point Likert scale, 10 determinative criteria derived from a combined search in literature and across (inter)national guideline developers. Top 20 topics received scores ranging from 0.01 to 0.2 and combined scores yielded a total score.

RESULTS:

The 118 surveys (response 29%) identified 157 different topics. Melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are top priority guideline topics. Venous leg ulcer, vasculitis, varicose veins, urticaria, acne, Lyme borreliosis, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, pruritus, syphilis, lymphoedema, decubitus ulcer, hidradenitis suppurativa, androgenic alopecia and bullous pemphigoïd complete the top 20. A further 15 topics have overlapping confidence intervals. Mortality and healthcare costs are regarded as less important criteria in topic selection (P < 0.04), than other criteria like the potential to reduce unwanted variation in practice.

CONCLUSION:

Dermatological professional organizations worldwide succeeded in developing guidelines for all top 20 topics. Respondents mostly agree with (inter)national guideline programmes and literature concerning the criteria important to selecting guideline topics.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades de la Piel / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Dermatología Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades de la Piel / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Dermatología Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article