Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Phase 1 Randomized, Open Label, Rectal Safety, Acceptability, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of Three Formulations of Tenofovir 1% Gel (the CHARM-01 Study).
Mcgowan, Ian; Cranston, Ross D; Duffill, Kathryn; Siegel, Aaron; Engstrom, Jarret C; Nikiforov, Alexyi; Jacobson, Cindy; Rehman, Khaja K; Elliott, Julie; Khanukhova, Elena; Abebe, Kaleab; Mauck, Christine; Spiegel, Hans M L; Dezzutti, Charlene S; Rohan, Lisa C; Marzinke, Mark A; Hiruy, Hiwot; Hendrix, Craig W; Richardson-Harman, Nicola; Anton, Peter A.
Afiliación
  • Mcgowan I; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Cranston RD; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Duffill K; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Siegel A; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Engstrom JC; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Nikiforov A; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Jacobson C; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Rehman KK; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Elliott J; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
  • Khanukhova E; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
  • Abebe K; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Mauck C; CONRAD, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
  • Spiegel HM; HJF-DAIDS, a Division of The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Contractor to National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Dezzutti CS; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Rohan LC; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Marzinke MA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Hiruy H; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Hendrix CW; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Richardson-Harman N; Alpha StatConsult LLC, Damascus, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Anton PA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0125363, 2015.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25942472
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The CHARM-01 study characterized the safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of three tenofovir (TFV) gels for rectal application. The vaginal formulation (VF) gel was previously used in the CAPRISA 004 and VOICE vaginal microbicide Phase 2B trials and the RMP-02/MTN-006 Phase 1 rectal safety study. The reduced glycerin VF (RGVF) gel was used in the MTN-007 Phase 1 rectal microbicide trial and is currently being evaluated in the MTN-017 Phase 2 rectal microbicide trial. A third rectal specific formulation (RF) gel was also evaluated in the CHARM-01 study.

METHODS:

Participants received 4 mL of the three TFV gels in a blinded, crossover

design:

seven daily doses of RGVF, seven daily doses of RF, and six daily doses of placebo followed by one dose of VF, in a randomized sequence. Safety, acceptability, compartmental PK, and explant PD were monitored throughout the trial.

RESULTS:

All three gels were found to be safe and acceptable. RF and RGVF PK were not significantly different. Median mucosal mononuclear cell (MMC) TFV-DP trended toward higher values for RF compared to RGVF (1136 and 320 fmol/106 cells respectively). Use of each gel in vivo was associated with significant inhibition of ex vivo colorectal tissue HIV infection. There was also a significant negative correlation between the tissue levels of TFV, tissue TFV-DP, MMC TFV-DP, rectal fluid TFV, and explant HIV-1 infection.

CONCLUSIONS:

All three formulations were found to be safe and acceptable. However, the safety profile of the VF gel was only based on exposure to one dose whereas participants received seven doses of the RGVF and RF gels. There was a trend towards higher tissue MMC levels of TFV-DP associated with use of the RF gel. Use of all gels was associated with significant inhibition of ex vivo tissue HIV infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01575405.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fármacos Anti-VIH / Tenofovir / Geles Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fármacos Anti-VIH / Tenofovir / Geles Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article