Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proctitis 1 Week after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Implications for Clinical Trial Design.
Paydar, Ima; Cyr, Robyn A; Yung, Thomas M; Lei, Siyuan; Collins, Brian Timothy; Chen, Leonard N; Suy, Simeng; Dritschilo, Anatoly; Lynch, John H; Collins, Sean P.
Afiliación
  • Paydar I; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Cyr RA; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Yung TM; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Lei S; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Collins BT; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Chen LN; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Suy S; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Dritschilo A; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Lynch JH; Department of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
  • Collins SP; Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA.
Front Oncol ; 6: 167, 2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27489794
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Proctitis following prostate cancer radiation therapy is a primary determinant of quality of life (QOL). While previous studies have assessed acute rectal morbidity at 1 month after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), little data exist on the prevalence and severity of rectal morbidity within the first week following treatment. This study reports the acute bowel morbidity 1 week following prostate SBRT. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Between May 2013 and August 2014, 103 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 35-36.25 Gy in five fractions using robotic SBRT delivered on a prospective clinical trial. Bowel toxicity was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAEv.4). Bowel QOL was assessed using the EPIC-26 questionnaire bowel domain at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Time-dependent changes in bowel symptoms were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Clinically significant change was assessed by the minimally important difference (MID) in EPIC score. This was defined as a change of 1/2 standard deviation (SD) from the baseline score.

RESULTS:

One-hundred and three patients with a minimum of 3 months of follow-up were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was 23%. There were no acute ≥ grade 3 bowel toxicities. EPIC bowel summary scores maximally declined at 1 week after SBRT (-13.9, p < 0.0001) before returning to baseline at 3 months after SBRT (+0.03, p = 0.94). Prior to treatment, 4.9% of men reported that their bowel bother was a moderate to big problem. This increased to 28.4% (p < 0.0001) 1 week after SBRT and returned to baseline at 3 months after SBRT (0.0%, p = 0.66). Only the bowel summary and bowel bother score declines at 1 week met the MID threshold for clinically significant change.

CONCLUSION:

The rate and severity of acute proctitis following prostate SBRT peaked at 1 week after treatment and returned to baseline by 3 months. Toxicity assessment at 1 week can therefore minimize recall bias and should aid in the design of future clinical trials focused on accurately capturing and minimizing acute morbidity following SBRT.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article