Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in executive functioning between violent and non-violent offenders.
Meijers, J; Harte, J M; Meynen, G; Cuijpers, P.
Afiliación
  • Meijers J; Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
  • Harte JM; Department of Criminal Law and Criminology,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
  • Meynen G; Department of Philosophy,Faculty of Humanities,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
  • Cuijpers P; Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
Psychol Med ; 47(10): 1784-1793, 2017 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28173890
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A growing body of neuropsychological and neurobiological research shows a relationship between functioning of the prefrontal cortex and criminal and violent behaviour. The prefrontal cortex is crucial for executive functions such as inhibition, attention, working memory, set-shifting and planning. A deficit in these functions - a prefrontal deficit - may result in antisocial, impulsive or even aggressive behaviour. While several meta-analyses show large effect sizes for the relationship between a prefrontal deficit, executive dysfunction and criminality, there are few studies investigating differences in executive functions between violent and non-violent offenders. Considering the relevance of identifying risk factors for violent offending, the current study explores whether a distinction between violent and non-violent offenders can be made using an extensive neuropsychological test battery.

METHOD:

Male remand prisoners (N = 130) in Penitentiary Institution Amsterdam Over-Amstel were administered an extensive neuropsychological test battery (Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery; CANTAB) measuring response inhibition, planning, attention, set-shifting, working memory and impulsivity/reward sensitivity.

RESULTS:

Violent offenders performed significantly worse on the stop-signal task (partial correlation r = 0.205, p = 0.024), a task measuring response inhibition. No further differences were found between violent and non-violent offenders. Explorative analyses revealed a significant relationship between recidivism and planning (partial correlation r = -0.209, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION:

Violent offenders show worse response inhibition compared to non-violent offenders, suggesting a more pronounced prefrontal deficit in violent offenders than in non-violent offenders.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Violencia / Corteza Prefrontal / Función Ejecutiva / Criminales / Inhibición Psicológica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Violencia / Corteza Prefrontal / Función Ejecutiva / Criminales / Inhibición Psicológica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article