Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
No Sting Barrier Film to Protect Skin in Adult Patients: Findings From a Scoping Review With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice.
Micheli, Chiara; Palese, Alvisa; Canzan, Federica; Ambrosi, Elisa.
Afiliación
  • Micheli C; Staff Nurse, APSP Dott., Antonio Bontempelli, Trento, Italy.
  • Palese A; Associate Professor, Udine University, Udine, Italy.
  • Canzan F; Clinical Teacher, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Ambrosi E; Clinical Teacher, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Polo Universitario Professioni Sanitarie, Trento, Italy.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs ; 14(5): 403-411, 2017 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28759158
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the industrialized world, approximately 1-1.5% of the population has received treatments for skin lesions. In the 1990s, a polymeric barrier film called the No Sting Barrier Film (NSBF) was developed as an alternative to petrolatum-based ointments and zinc oxide formulas. To date, few studies have explored the effectiveness of NSBF in protecting skin integrity.

AIMS:

To map the methods, fields and outcomes used to produce evidence on NSBF effectiveness.

METHODS:

A scoping review was performed in 2015. A search strategy for identifying relevant studies was designed and performed. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and comparative studies for all types of interventions were included; research conducted in any clinical context was eligible for inclusion. Studies were selected by two reviewers; data extraction and analysis also was performed by two reviewers and disagreements were discussed.

RESULTS:

Six studies were included. NSBF's potential as a skin protector was investigated with respect to (a) chronic wounds (pressure ulcers or vascular leg ulcers); (b) urinary or fecal incontinence; and (c) post-mastectomy irradiation. The principal clinical outcomes investigated were, respectively (a) wound healing, wound exudates and erythema control; (b) incidence of incontinence-associated dermatitis and skin reactions; and (c) intensity of pruritus and skin reactions. Pain and comfort were measured in all clinical applications. The main process outcomes investigated were (a) ease of application, (b) application and removal time, and (c) costs. Zinc oxide and petroleum formulations were the most common comparison interventions in research on chronic ulcers and incontinence; sorbolene cream and topical corticosteroids were the most frequent comparisons in the context of post-mastectomy irradiation. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION NBSF may be used for peri-wound skin protection in patients with chronic wounds, with urinary or fecal incontinence and for women undergoing post-mastectomy irradiation. However, more robust experimental studies are needed in all clinical fields where NBSF is applied.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Piel / Cuidados de la Piel / Crema para la Piel Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Piel / Cuidados de la Piel / Crema para la Piel Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article