Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality assessment of uterine artery Doppler measurement in first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia.
Rolnik, D L; da Silva Costa, F; Sahota, D; Hyett, J; McLennan, A.
Afiliación
  • Rolnik DL; Perinatal Services, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
  • da Silva Costa F; Perinatal Services, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Sahota D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University and Monash Ultrasound for Women, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Hyett J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • McLennan A; Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 53(2): 245-250, 2019 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29917286
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the quality of mean uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index (PI) measurement in a first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening program.

METHODS:

Consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy attending first-trimester screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities also had combined screening for pre-eclampsia based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm, at a large practice in Sydney, Australia, from May 2014 to February 2017. Distributions of mean UtA-PI multiples of the median (MoM) on a logarithmic scale were plotted in relation to the normal median with 95% CI for each operator and for each month. Central tendency and dispersion and cumulative sum charts were produced. Mean UtA-PI MoM values between 0.95 and 1.05 were considered ideal and those between 0.90 and 1.10 were considered acceptable. The screen-positive rates for preterm pre-eclampsia in different groups of sonographers according to their mean log10 UtA-PI MoM were calculated and compared using the chi-square test.

RESULTS:

A total of 21 010 women attended for first-trimester ultrasound and had screening for pre-eclampsia. The overall median UtA-PI MoM was 1.042 (interquartile range (IQR), 0.85-1.26). Of 46 sonographers, 42 (91.3%) performed more than 50 examinations and, of those, 41 (97.6%) measured UtA-PI within the acceptable range. Sonographers measuring UtA-PI MoM on average below 0.95 and those measuring it above 1.05 had, respectively, lower and higher screen-positive rates when compared with those with measurements within the 0.95-1.05 UtA-PI MoM interval (7.2% and 13.2% vs 11.2%, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

UtA Doppler is measured well among trained operators when following an established protocol. While slight variations are expected, systematic error in this measurement impacts on the screen-positive rate. Therefore, a quality control process should be in place and retraining of staff may be required. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Preeclampsia / Flujo Pulsátil / Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color / Arteria Uterina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Preeclampsia / Flujo Pulsátil / Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color / Arteria Uterina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article